Literature DB >> 9568663

A randomized comparison of acute phase response and endotoxemia in patients with perforated peptic ulcers receiving laparoscopic or open patch repair.

J Y Lau1, S Y Lo, E K Ng, D W Lee, Y H Lam, S C Chung.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In patients with peritonitis from perforated peptic ulcers, we compared acute stress responses, endotoxemia, and bacteremia following laparoscopic or open surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Consecutive patients with peritonitis from perforated peptic ulcers were randomized to receive laparoscopic sutured or open omental repair. Undiluted peritoneal fluid was obtained at surgery for quantitative bacterial and endotoxin (Limulus Amoebocyte Lysate) assay. Serial blood samples were taken at 0, 30, 60, 90, 120, and 180 minutes, and at 12, 24, 48, 72, and 120 hours for determinations of quantitative bacterial and endotoxin assays, interleukin-6 (IL-6), C-reactive protein (CRP), and cortisol.
RESULTS: Twenty-two patients were randomized: laparoscopy group (n = 12), open repair group (n = 10). Conversions were required in 3 patients assigned to laparoscopy, leaving 9 patients for analysis. The two groups were comparable in their demographic data, median duration of perforation (13.5 hours versus 10 hours), severity of peritoneal contamination as indicated by viable bacterial count (5.9 x 102 versus 1.5 x 10(2) colony forming unit/mL) and endotoxin concentration in peritoneal fluid (27.2 versus 24.6 EU/mL). No significant endotoxemia or bacteremia was detected in these patients. Median interleukin-6 was highest at 0 hour (1520 versus 962 pg/mL) and fell rapidly following surgery. C-reactive protein peaked at 24 hours and plateaued thereafter. Cortisol was highest intraoperatively and fell thereafter. No difference was noted between the two treatment groups with respect to these inflammatory markers (IL-6 P = 0.19, CRP P = 0.14, cortisol P = 0.56, multivariate analysis of variance).
CONCLUSION: Endotoxemia and bacteremia are insignificant in most patients with perforated peptic ulcers. In patients with perforated peptic ulcers, laparoscopic patch repair does not reduce acute stress responses when compared with open surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9568663     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9610(98)00006-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  18 in total

1.  The management of leaking rectal anastomoses by minimally invasive techniques.

Authors:  M Pera; S Delgado; J C García-Valdecasas; M Pera; A Castells; J M Piqué; E Bombuy; A M Lacy
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-12-10       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Laparoscopic treatment of gastroduodenal perforations: comparison with conventional surgery.

Authors:  B Kirshtein; M Bayme; T Mayer; L Lantsberg; E Avinoach; S Mizrahi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-09-27       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Effect of intraperitoneal application of an endotoxin inhibitor on survival time in a laparoscopic model of peritonitis in rats.

Authors:  Roger Kuhn; Daniel Schubert; Joerg Tautenhahn; Gerd Nestler; Hans-Ulrich Schulz; Maike Bartelmann; Hans Lippert; Matthias Pross
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Laparoscopic appendectomy for perforated appendicitis.

Authors:  Jimmy B Y So; Ee-Cherk Chiong; Edmond Chiong; Wei-Keat Cheah; David Lomanto; Peter Goh; Cheng-Kiong Kum
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2002-09-26       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  64-Slice multidetector computed tomography evaluation of gastrointestinal tract perforation site: detectability of direct findings in upper and lower GI tract.

Authors:  Sota Oguro; Tomohiro Funabiki; Koji Hosoda; Yukio Inoue; Takashi Yamane; Michihiro Sato; Mitsuhide Kitano; Masahiro Jinzaki
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-12-08       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Perforated Peptic Ulcer Repair: Factors Predicting Conversion in Laparoscopy and Postoperative Septic Complications.

Authors:  Markus K Muller; Simon Wrann; Jeannette Widmer; Jennifer Klasen; Markus Weber; Dieter Hahnloser
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 7.  Management strategies, early results, benefits, and risk factors of laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcer.

Authors:  Raimundas Lunevicius; Matas Morkevicius
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Laparoscopic Repair for Perforated Peptic Ulcer Disease Has Better Outcomes Than Open Repair.

Authors:  Gaik S Quah; Guy D Eslick; Michael R Cox
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2018-11-21       Impact factor: 3.452

9.  Perforated duodenal ulcer associated with anterior abdominal abscess: A case report.

Authors:  Sun Zhonghua; Awaji Al-Naami; Ali Khan Liaqat
Journal:  Australas Med J       Date:  2012-01-31

10.  Systemic inflammation and immune response after laparotomy vs laparoscopy in patients with acute cholecystitis, complicated by peritonitis.

Authors:  Federico Sista; Mario Schietroma; Giuseppe De Santis; Antonella Mattei; Emanuela Marina Cecilia; Federica Piccione; Sergio Leardi; Francesco Carlei; Gianfranco Amicucci
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-04-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.