Literature DB >> 9568587

Possible age-dependent adaptive response to a low dose of X-rays in human lymphocytes.

P K Gadhia1.   

Abstract

Human peripheral blood lymphocytes from 30 healthy donors aged from 5 to 65 years consisting of four groups, namely 5 (six males), 25 (six females), 45 (six males) and 65 years old (six males and six females), were exposed to a single adaptive dose of 0.01 Gy X-rays followed by a challenge dose of 2.0 Gy X-rays. All age groups responded with a significantly reduced incidence of chromatid and isochromatid breaks except Group 4 (65 years male and female groups), where adaptive and challenge doses did not significantly reduce chromatid and isochromatid breaks. Results indicate the possibility of an inducible chromosomal repair mechanism in human blood lymphocytes. It suggests that ageing could be a factor which abolishes the adaptive response.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9568587     DOI: 10.1093/mutage/13.2.151

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutagenesis        ISSN: 0267-8357            Impact factor:   3.000


  7 in total

1.  A method for detecting abasic sites in living cells: age-dependent changes in base excision repair.

Authors:  H Atamna; I Cheung; B N Ames
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-01-18       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Radioadaptive response in human lymphocyte cells.

Authors:  Najmeh Assadi; Ebrahim Zabihi; Meysam Khosravifarsani; Soraya Khafri; Haleh Akhavanniaki; Mehrangiz Amiri; Ali Shabestani-Monfared
Journal:  Int J Mol Cell Med       Date:  2014

3.  Mass Spectrometric Quantitation of Apurinic/Apyrimidinic Sites in Tissue DNA of Rats Exposed to Tobacco-Specific Nitrosamines and in Lung and Leukocyte DNA of Cigarette Smokers and Nonsmokers.

Authors:  Jiehong Guo; Haoqing Chen; Pramod Upadhyaya; Yingchun Zhao; Robert J Turesky; Stephen S Hecht
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2020-09-09       Impact factor: 3.739

Review 4.  Cytogenetic perspective of ageing and longevity in men and women.

Authors:  E Zietkiewicz; A Wojda; M Witt
Journal:  J Appl Genet       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Radiation-induced cancer: a modern view.

Authors:  D J Shah; R K Sachs; D J Wilson
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  Cancer risks attributable to low doses of ionizing radiation: assessing what we really know.

Authors:  David J Brenner; Richard Doll; Dudley T Goodhead; Eric J Hall; Charles E Land; John B Little; Jay H Lubin; Dale L Preston; R Julian Preston; Jerome S Puskin; Elaine Ron; Rainer K Sachs; Jonathan M Samet; Richard B Setlow; Marco Zaider
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-11-10       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  A single whole-body low dose X-irradiation does not affect L1, B1 and IAP repeat element DNA methylation longitudinally.

Authors:  Michelle R Newman; Pamela J Sykes; Benjamin J Blyth; Eva Bezak; Mark D Lawrence; Katherine L Morel; Rebecca J Ormsby
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-27       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.