Literature DB >> 9566192

On the mechanism of inhibition of phage T7 RNA polymerase by lac repressor.

P J Lopez1, J Guillerez, R Sousa, M Dreyfus.   

Abstract

We study here the effect on phage T7 RNA polymerase activity of lac repressor bound downstream of the T7 promoter. When repressor binds in vitro at an operator centered at +13 or +15 with respect to transcription start, it does not prevent initiation, though the transcript yield is reduced. However, the processivity of the polymerase is depressed and transcript extension is blocked at positions +4 and +6, respectively. These results indicate that repressor and polymerase do not simply exclude each other from the promoter. Rather, they would come into steric conflict and compete for establishment or retention of interactions with the same segment of DNA, without this leading to the immediate displacement of either polymerase or repressor. The resulting destabilization of the transcription complex would depress both initiation rate and enzyme processivity. In contrast to the above results, little reduction in runoff transcription is observed when operator is centered at +47. The decreased sensitivity of polymerase to repressor bound at +47 versus +13 or +15 is likely to be due to the higher stability of the elongation complex during the transcription of downstream regions in comparison with the first transcribed nucleotides. We also show that under conditions of leaky repression and with operator centered at +13, a mutant T7 RNA polymerase showing normal promoter affinity but a slower elongation rate is more sensitive to repression than the wild-type enzyme, both in vitro and in vivo. In vitro, this higher sensitivity is largely due to a reduced ability of the mutant to overcome the elongation block at position +4. The parallel between the in vitro and in vivo data suggests that in vivo the repressor also does not prevent polymerase from binding to promoter, but interferes with subsequent steps in initiation and transcript extension, in this case presumably largely extension beyond +4.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9566192     DOI: 10.1006/jmbi.1997.1576

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Biol        ISSN: 0022-2836            Impact factor:   5.469


  12 in total

1.  The histone-like protein HU does not obstruct movement of T7 RNA polymerase in Escherichia coli cells but stimulates its activity.

Authors:  Pilar Morales; Josette Rouviere-Yaniv; Marc Dreyfus
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 3.490

Review 2.  Repression of transcription initiation in bacteria.

Authors:  F Rojo
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 3.490

3.  Transcription through the roadblocks: the role of RNA polymerase cooperation.

Authors:  Vitaly Epshtein; Francine Toulmé; A Rachid Rahmouni; Sergei Borukhov; Evgeny Nudler
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2003-09-15       Impact factor: 11.598

4.  The transcriptional repressor CcpN from Bacillus subtilis uses different repression mechanisms at different promoters.

Authors:  Andreas Licht; Sabine Brantl
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2009-09-02       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 5.  Aspects of protein-DNA interactions: a review of quantitative thermodynamic theory for modelling synthetic circuits utilising LacI and CI repressors, IPTG and the reporter gene lacZ.

Authors:  Peter D Munro; Gary K Ackers; Keith E Shearwin
Journal:  Biophys Rev       Date:  2016-11-07

6.  Mutational analysis of the mycobacteriophage BPs promoter PR reveals context-dependent sequences for mycobacterial gene expression.

Authors:  Lauren M Oldfield; Graham F Hatfull
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2014-08-04       Impact factor: 3.490

7.  Thrombin-mediated transcriptional regulation using DNA aptamers in DNA-based cell-free protein synthesis.

Authors:  Sukanya Iyer; Mitchel J Doktycz
Journal:  ACS Synth Biol       Date:  2013-09-26       Impact factor: 5.110

Review 8.  Transcriptional repression: conserved and evolved features.

Authors:  Sandhya Payankaulam; Li M Li; David N Arnosti
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2010-09-14       Impact factor: 10.834

9.  Operator sequence alters gene expression independently of transcription factor occupancy in bacteria.

Authors:  Hernan G Garcia; Alvaro Sanchez; James Q Boedicker; Melisa Osborne; Jeff Gelles; Jane Kondev; Rob Phillips
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2012-07-12       Impact factor: 9.423

10.  Regulation of internal promoters in a zinc-responsive operon is influenced by transcription from upstream promoters.

Authors:  Mauro Napolitano; Miguel Ángel Rubio; Sergio Camargo; Ignacio Luque
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2013-01-11       Impact factor: 3.490

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.