Literature DB >> 9565937

Effect of shoe insert construction on foot and leg movement.

B M Nigg1, A Khan, V Fisher, D Stefanyshyn.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to quantify changes in foot eversion and tibial rotation during running resulting from systematic changes of material composition of five shoe inserts of the same shape.
METHODS: Tests were performed with 12 subjects. The inserts had a bilayer design using two different materials at the top and bottom of the insert. The functional kinematic variables examined in this study were the foot-leg in-eversion angle, beta, and the leg-foot tibial rotation, rho. Additionally, the subject characteristics of arch height, relative arch deformation, and active range of motion were quantified. The statistical analysis used was a two way repeated measures MANOVA (within trials and inserts).
RESULTS: The average group changes resulting from the studied inserts in total shoe eversion, total foot eversion, and total internal tibial rotation were typically smaller than 1 degree when compared with the no-insert condition and were statistically not significant. The measured ranges of total foot eversion for all subjects were smallest for the softest and about twice as large for the hardest insert construction. Thus, the soft insert construction was more restrictive, forcing all feet into a similar movement pattern, whereas the harder combinations allowed for more individual variation of foot and leg movement and did not force the foot into a preset movement pattern. The individual results showed substantial differences between subjects and a trend: Subjects who generally showed a reduction of tibial rotation with all tested inserts typically had a flexible foot. However, subjects who generally showed an increase of tibial rotation typically had a stiff foot.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that subject specific factors such as static, dynamic, and neuro-physiological characteristics of foot and leg are important to match specific feet and shoe inserts optimally.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9565937     DOI: 10.1097/00005768-199804000-00013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc        ISSN: 0195-9131            Impact factor:   5.411


  9 in total

1.  Structure, sex, and strength and knee and hip kinematics during landing.

Authors:  Jennifer S Howard; Melisa A Fazio; Carl G Mattacola; Timothy L Uhl; Cale A Jacobs
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2011 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.860

2.  Lower extremity kinematics in children with and without flexible flatfoot: a comparative study.

Authors:  Yi-Fen Shih; Chao-Yin Chen; Wen-Yin Chen; Hsiu-Chen Lin
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2012-03-02       Impact factor: 2.362

3.  A Multi-Stage Human Factors and Comfort Assessment of Instrumented Insoles Designed for Use in a Connected Health Infrastructure.

Authors:  Richard Harte; Leo R Quinlan; Liam Glynn; Alejandro Rodriguez-Molinero; Thomas Scharf; Carlos Carenas; Elisenda Reixach; Joan Garcia; Jordi Carrabina; Gearóid ÓLaighin
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2015-12-16

4.  Relationship between the mobility of medial longitudinal arch and postural control.

Authors:  Tansu Birinci; Sule Badıllı Demirbas
Journal:  Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 1.511

5.  Kinematic Effect on the Navicular Bone with the Use of Rearfoot Varus Wedge.

Authors:  Álvaro Gómez Carrión; Maria de Los Ángeles Atín Arratibel; Maria Rosario Morales Lozano; Carlos Martínez Sebastián; Blanca de la Cruz Torres; Rubén Sánchez-Gómez
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 3.576

6.  Effects of Foot-Core Training on Foot-Ankle Kinematics and Running Kinetics in Runners: Secondary Outcomes From a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Alessandra B Matias; Ricky Watari; Ulisses T Taddei; Paolo Caravaggi; Rafael S Inoue; Raissa B Thibes; Eneida Y Suda; Marcus F Vieira; Isabel C N Sacco
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-04-14

Review 7.  Contemporary Review: The Foot and Ankle in Long-Distance Running.

Authors:  James R Jastifer
Journal:  Foot Ankle Orthop       Date:  2022-09-26

8.  Effect of toe joint stiffness and toe shape on walking biomechanics.

Authors:  Eric C Honert; Gerasimos Bastas; Karl E Zelik
Journal:  Bioinspir Biomim       Date:  2018-10-10       Impact factor: 2.956

9.  The long-term use of foot orthoses affects walking kinematics and kinetics of children with flexible flat feet: A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  AmirAli Jafarnezhadgero; Morteza Madadi-Shad; Seyed Majid Alavi-Mehr; Urs Granacher
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-09       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.