OBJECTIVES: To determine 1) the frequency of missed vaccine opportunities (VOs) in inner city children </=3 years of age; 2) whether the recommended vaccine(s) were given within 6 months of the missed opportunity (MO); 3) whether these vaccinations were age-appropriate according to the guidelines of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices; and 4) variables associated with MOs. DESIGN: Retrospective chart review with a nested retrospective cohort of children with MOs. SETTING: Two inner city practice settings in Milwaukee: a community health center and an academic continuity care practice. PATIENTS/SELECTION PROCEDURE: A consecutive sample of 710 visits of inner city children </=3 years of age with VOs, seen between January 1 and March 31, 1995. A VO was defined as any encounter when the child was vaccine-eligible according to Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices guidelines. RESULTS: MOs occurred in 47% (330/710) of the VOs. Only 40% of the children with MOs received age-appropriate immunizations within 6 months; 30% received the vaccinations beyond the age-appropriate time. The remaining 30% either did not return or were not vaccinated on return. The variables significantly associated with MOs were 1) age: children with MOs were older than those without, with a mean age of 15.5 months vs 10.9 months; 2) minor febrile illness; 3) moderate/severe illness; 4) acute illness encounters; and 5) patient's being seen at the community health center. Only 15.5% of all MOs were justified by the presence of moderate/severe illness. CONCLUSIONS: VOs are frequently missed in inner city children. Most of the MOs were not justified by the valid contraindication of moderate/severe illness. Sixty percent of the children with MOs did not receive age-appropriate immunizations within 6 months. These children are vulnerable to vaccine-preventable diseases such as measles and pertussis.
OBJECTIVES: To determine 1) the frequency of missed vaccine opportunities (VOs) in inner city children </=3 years of age; 2) whether the recommended vaccine(s) were given within 6 months of the missed opportunity (MO); 3) whether these vaccinations were age-appropriate according to the guidelines of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices; and 4) variables associated with MOs. DESIGN: Retrospective chart review with a nested retrospective cohort of children with MOs. SETTING: Two inner city practice settings in Milwaukee: a community health center and an academic continuity care practice. PATIENTS/SELECTION PROCEDURE: A consecutive sample of 710 visits of inner city children </=3 years of age with VOs, seen between January 1 and March 31, 1995. A VO was defined as any encounter when the child was vaccine-eligible according to Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices guidelines. RESULTS: MOs occurred in 47% (330/710) of the VOs. Only 40% of the children with MOs received age-appropriate immunizations within 6 months; 30% received the vaccinations beyond the age-appropriate time. The remaining 30% either did not return or were not vaccinated on return. The variables significantly associated with MOs were 1) age: children with MOs were older than those without, with a mean age of 15.5 months vs 10.9 months; 2) minor febrile illness; 3) moderate/severe illness; 4) acute illness encounters; and 5) patient's being seen at the community health center. Only 15.5% of all MOs were justified by the presence of moderate/severe illness. CONCLUSIONS: VOs are frequently missed in inner city children. Most of the MOs were not justified by the valid contraindication of moderate/severe illness. Sixty percent of the children with MOs did not receive age-appropriate immunizations within 6 months. These children are vulnerable to vaccine-preventable diseases such as measles and pertussis.
Authors: Cameron C Grant; Nikki M Turner; Deon G York; Felicity Goodyear-Smith; Helen A Petousis-Harris Journal: Br J Gen Pract Date: 2010-03 Impact factor: 5.386
Authors: Philip J Smith; Sharon G Humiston; Trish Parnell; Kirsten S Vannice; Daniel A Salmon Journal: Public Health Rep Date: 2010 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 2.792
Authors: Peter G Szilagyi; Janet R Serwint; Sharon G Humiston; Cynthia M Rand; Stanley Schaffer; Phyllis Vincelli; Nui Dhepyasuwan; Aaron Blumkin; Christina Albertin; C Robinette Curtis Journal: Acad Pediatr Date: 2015 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 3.107