Literature DB >> 9565409

Pediatricians' awareness of and attitudes about four clinical practice guidelines.

D A Christakis1, F P Rivara.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The increasing complexity of medical care and a desire to increase quality and control costs have led to growing use of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs). It is unclear how helpful these guidelines are to the practitioners expected to use them. We surveyed pediatricians about their knowledge and impressions of four well-publicized CPGs: the American Academy of Pediatrics' "Practice Parameter for Hyperbilirubinemia in Newborns" (hyperbilirubinemia), "A Guideline for the Management of Febrile Infants" (fever), the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research's "Guideline for Otitis Media With Effusion" (otitis), and the US Preventive Services Task Force Guide to Clinical Preventive Services (preventive care).
OBJECTIVES: 1) What percentage of practicing pediatricians are aware of these guidelines? 2) How helpful do they find them? 3) What are practitioners' perceived limitations of these guidelines? 4) Have these guidelines affected provider behavior? 5) Are there features of a provider's training or practice that are associated with changing practice as a result of guidelines?
DESIGN: A national survey of 600 pediatricians selected at random from the American Medical Association master file.
RESULTS: A total of 300 of 555 eligible participants (54%) returned surveys. Of the respondents, 66% were aware of the hyperbilirubinemia guideline, 64% of the fever guideline, 50% of the otitis guideline, but only 16% knew of the preventive care guidelines. Mean helpfulness scores (1 to 10 scale, where 1 = "not at all helpful" and 10 = "extremely helpful") ranged from 3.67 to 6.67 for the different guidelines. In terms of limitations, 15% to 33% of respondents reported that CPGs were "too cookbook," 6% to 19% reported that they were "too time-consuming," and 4% to 16% reported that they were "too cumbersome." Additional reported limitations were believing that a guideline left no room for personal experience and judgment, concern of increased liability risk, and poor parental acceptance of CPG recommendations. The proportions reporting change in management as a result of a CPG were 28% for the hyperbilirubinemia guideline, 36% for the fever guideline, 19% for the preventive care guidelines, and 28% for the otitis guideline. Mean helpfulness scores reported by nonuniversity-affiliated physicians were significantly higher than those reported by university-affiliated physicians. In a regression model of respondents aware of a particular guideline, more recent graduation from medical school and increased helpfulness scores were associated with guideline-related behavior change.
CONCLUSION: In their present form, CPGs are not perceived as very helpful by most practitioners. More recent medical school graduates and nonuniversity-affiliated physicians are more likely to find them helpful and more likely to change their behavior because of them.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9565409     DOI: 10.1542/peds.101.5.825

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatrics        ISSN: 0031-4005            Impact factor:   7.124


  36 in total

1.  Are adolescents being screened for sexually transmitted diseases? A study of low income African American adolescents in San Francisco.

Authors:  J M Ellen; M A Lane; J McCright
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 3.519

2.  Are adolescents being screened for sexually transmitted diseases?

Authors:  J M Ellen; M A Lane; J McCright
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  2000-08

3.  Best paediatric evidence; is it accessible and used on-call?

Authors:  F A I Riordan; E M Boyle; B Phillips
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 3.791

Review 4.  Clinical practice guidelines: what they are, why we need them and how they should be developed through rigorous evaluation.

Authors:  Cristina Cecamore; Alessandra Savino; Roberta Salvatore; Alessandro Cafarotti; Piernicola Pelliccia; Angelika Mohn; Francesco Chiarelli
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2010-12-07       Impact factor: 3.183

5.  Collaboration between the medical informatics community and guideline authors: fostering HIT standard development that matters.

Authors:  Paul G Biondich; Stephen M Downs; Aaron E Carroll; Richard N Shiffman; Clement J McDonald
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2006

6.  Management of hyperbilirubinemia and prevention of kernicterus in 20 patients with Crigler-Najjar disease.

Authors:  Kevin A Strauss; Donna L Robinson; Hendrik J Vreman; Erik G Puffenberger; Graham Hart; D Holmes Morton
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2006-01-25       Impact factor: 3.183

7.  Rigorous development does not ensure that guidelines are acceptable to a panel of knowledgeable providers.

Authors:  Teryl K Nuckols; Yee-Wei Lim; Barbara O Wynn; Soeren Mattke; Catherine H MacLean; Philip Harber; Robert H Brook; Peggy Wallace; Rena H Garland; Steven Asch
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2007-11-21       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  From practice guidelines to clinical decision support: closing the loop.

Authors:  John Fox; Vivek Patkar; Ioannis Chronakis; Richard Begent
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 5.344

9.  Providing adolescent sexual health care in the pediatric emergency department: views of health care providers.

Authors:  Melissa K Miller; Cynthia J Mollen; Donna O'Malley; Rhea L Owens; Genevieve A Maliszewski; Kathy Goggin; Patricia Kelly
Journal:  Pediatr Emerg Care       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 1.454

10.  Quality of care of Egyptian asthmatic children: clinicians adherence to asthma guidelines.

Authors:  Ashraf A Salama; Ahmed A Mohammed; El Sayed E El Okda; Rasha M Said
Journal:  Ital J Pediatr       Date:  2010-04-21       Impact factor: 2.638

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.