Literature DB >> 9564641

Devices for endometrial sampling. A comparison.

D R Mishell1, A M Kaunitz.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical performance of two endometrial sampling devices, the GynoSampler and Pipelle. STUDY
DESIGN: During a single office visit, gynecology patients at Women's Hospital, Los Angeles, and the teaching clinic of the University of Florida Health Science Center, Jacksonville, underwent two endometrial biopsies, one with each device. The specimen adequacy, pain associated with the sampling procedure and ease of use of the two devices were compared.
RESULTS: One hundred women, 50 at each clinical center, were evaluated. No significant differences in specimen adequacy were noted, with at least 90% of specimens retrieved with each device sufficient for diagnosis. Patient discomfort ratings were similar for the two devices. However, physicians performing the biopsies noted that the GynoSampler device was easier to use than the Pipelle based on three parameters (P < .05).
CONCLUSION: Although the GynoSampler and Pipelle appear comparable from the perspectives of diagnostic performance and patient discomfort, the GynoSampler was easier to use.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9564641

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Reprod Med        ISSN: 0024-7758            Impact factor:   0.142


  1 in total

1.  Effect of hormone replacement therapy on postmenopausal endometrial bleeding.

Authors:  Zoltan Magyar; Eniko Berkes; Zsolt Csapo; Zoltan Papp
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2007-12-25       Impact factor: 3.201

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.