Literature DB >> 9564423

Enamel thickness of the posterior dentition: its implications for nonextraction treatment.

J L Stroud1, J English, P H Buschang.   

Abstract

This study describes mesial and distal enamel thickness of the permanent posterior mandibular dentition. The sample comprised 98 Caucasian adults (59 males, 39 females) 20 to 35 years old. Bitewing radiographs of the right permanent mandibular premolars and first and second molars were illuminated and transferred to a computer at a fixed magnification via a video camera. Enamel and dentin thicknesses were identified and digitized on the plane representing the maximum mesiodistal diameter of each tooth. The results showed that there were no significant sex differences in either mesial or distal enamel thickness. Enamel on the second molars was significantly thicker (0.3 to 0.4 mm) than enamel on the premolars. Distal enamel was significantly thicker than mesial enamel. There was approximately 10 mm of total enamel on the four teeth combined. Assuming 50% enamel reduction, the premolars and molars should provide 9.8 mm of additional space for realignment of mandibular teeth.

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9564423     DOI: 10.1043/0003-3219(1998)068<0141:ETOTPD>2.3.CO;2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Angle Orthod        ISSN: 0003-3219            Impact factor:   2.079


  13 in total

1.  Efficiency of powered systems for interproximal enamel reduction (IER) and enamel roughness before and after polishing-an in vitro study.

Authors:  Sebastian Zingler; Andreas Sommer; Sinan Sen; Daniel Saure; Jochen Langer; Olivier Guillon; Christopher J Lux
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2015-09-30       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Quantitative evaluation of implemented interproximal enamel reduction during aligner therapy.

Authors:  Zamira Kalemaj; Luca Levrini
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 2.079

3.  Inter-proximal enamel reduction in contemporary orthodontics.

Authors:  J Pindoria; P S Fleming; P K Sharma
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2016-12-16       Impact factor: 1.626

4.  Orthofile®: a new approach for mechanical interproximal reduction : a scanning electron microscopic enamel evaluation.

Authors:  L Lombardo; M P Guarneri; P D'Amico; C Molinari; V Meddis; A Carlucci; G Siciliani
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2014-05-15       Impact factor: 1.938

5.  Dislodgement resistance of modified resin-bonded fixed partial dentures utilizing tooth undercuts: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Re-Mee Doh; Keun-Woo Lee
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2009-07-31       Impact factor: 1.904

6.  A comparison of second premolar extraction and mini-implant total arch distalization with interproximal stripping.

Authors:  Min-Ho Jung
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2012-11-30       Impact factor: 2.079

7.  Change in the pulp chamber temperature with different stripping techniques.

Authors:  José Carlos d'Ornellas Pereira; André Weissheimer; Luciane Macedo de Menezes; Eduardo Martinelli Santayana de Lima; Maurício Mezomo
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2014-09-25       Impact factor: 2.750

8.  Influence of Invisalign treatment with interproximal enamel reduction (IER) on bone volume for adult crowding: a retrospective three-dimensional cone beam computed tomography study.

Authors:  Andreas Hellak; Nicola Schmidt; Michael Schauseil; Steffen Stein; Thomas Drechsler; Heike Maria Korbmacher-Steiner
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 2.757

9.  An in vitro study on the effect of an oscillating stripping method on enamel roughness.

Authors:  Stefan Baumgartner; Anna Iliadi; Theodore Eliades; George Eliades
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2015-02-10       Impact factor: 2.750

10.  Enamel reduction techniques in orthodontics: a literature review.

Authors:  Christos Livas; Albert Cornelis Jongsma; Yijin Ren
Journal:  Open Dent J       Date:  2013-10-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.