Literature DB >> 9564060

Laparoscopic appraisal of the anatomic relationship of the umbilicus to the aortic bifurcation.

F Nezhat1, A I Brill, C H Nezhat, A Nezhat, D S Seidman, C Nezhat.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: To determine the cephalocaudal relationship among the umbilicus, aortic bifurcation, and iliac vessels by direct measurement during laparoscopy.
DESIGN: Prospective, consecutive study (Canadian Task Force classification II-1).
SETTING: Tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: Ninety-seven women undergoing operative laparoscopy.
INTERVENTIONS: The distance from the aortic bifurcation relative to the umbilicus was measured in both the supine and Trendelenburg positions with a marked suction-irrigator probe. Patients were stratified into three groups based on body mass index (kg/m2). The anatomic location of the common iliac vessels and course of the left common iliac vein were identified in 68 women.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The position of the aortic bifurcation ranged from 5 cm cephalad to 3 cm caudal to the umbilicus in the supine position, and from 3 cm cephalad to 3 cm caudal in the Trendelenburg position. In the supine position, the aortic bifurcation was located caudal to the umbilicus in only 11% of patients compared with 33% in the Trendelenburg position. This difference was statistically significant for the total study population (p <0.0001) and for the nonoverweight group (p <0.01). In both positions no significant correlation was found between the distance from the aortic bifurcation to the umbilicus and body mass index. Mean +/- SD distance of the aortic bifurcation from the umbilicus in the supine position was 0.1 +/- 1.2 cm for the nonoverweight group, 0.7 +/- 1.5 cm for the overweight group, and 1. 2 +/- 1.5 cm for the very overweight group. Respective values in Trendelenburg position were 1.0 +/- 1.1, -0.4 +/- 1.2, and -0.2 +/- 1.3 cm. The common iliac artery was caudal to the umbilicus in four women. The space between common iliac arteries was always at least partly occupied by the left common iliac vein, and was completely filled in 19 women (28%).
CONCLUSIONS: The cephalocaudal relationship between the aortic bifurcation and umbilicus varies widely and is not related to body mass index in anesthetized patients. Regardless of body mass index, the aortic bifurcation is more likely to be located caudal to the umbilicus in the Trendelenburg compared with the supine position. Its presumed location can be misleading during Veress needle or primary cannula insertion, and a more reliable guide is necessary for this procedure to avoid major retroperitoneal vascular injury.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9564060     DOI: 10.1016/s1074-3804(98)80079-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc        ISSN: 1074-3804


  12 in total

1.  Abdominal wall dimensions and umbilical position vary widely with BMI and should be taken into account when choosing port locations.

Authors:  S Ambardar; J Cabot; V Cekic; K Baxter; T D Arnell; K A Forde; A Nihalani; R L Whelan
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-06-14       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  The umbilicus: a reliable surface landmark for the aortic bifurcation?

Authors:  Lukas Attwell; Sarah Rosen; Bhavin Upadhyay; Peter Gogalniceanu
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2015-06-05       Impact factor: 1.246

3.  Open Versus Closed Laparoscopy: Yet an Unresolved Controversy.

Authors:  Milan Kumar Taye; Syed Abul Fazal; David Pegu; Dayanada Saikia
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-02-01

Review 4.  Laparoscopic entry techniques: clinical guideline, national survey, and medicolegal ramifications.

Authors:  Rajesh Varma; Janesh K Gupta
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-04-10       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 5.  Trocar Injuries in Laparoscopy: Techniques, Tools, and Means for Prevention. A Systematic Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Bram Cornette; Frederik Berrevoet
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Vertical distance between umbilicus to aortic bifurcation on coronal view in Korean women.

Authors:  Joo Yeon Jeong; Yeo Rang Kim; Ju Yeong Kim; Byung Chul Jee; Seok Hyun Kim
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Sci       Date:  2014-01-16

7.  Comparison of two entry methods for laparoscopic port entry: technical point of view.

Authors:  Adriana Toro; Maurizio Mannino; Giovanni Cappello; Andrea Di Stefano; Isidoro Di Carlo
Journal:  Diagn Ther Endosc       Date:  2012-06-13

8.  Bladeless direct optical trocar insertion in laparoscopic procedures on the obese patient.

Authors:  Andrea Tinelli; Antonio Malvasi; Ospan A Mynbaev; Daniel Alberto Tsin; Fausto Davila; Guillermo Dominguez; Emanuele Perrone; Farr R Nezhat
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2013 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.172

9.  Video-assisted laparoscopy for the detection and diagnosis of endometriosis: safety, reliability, and invasiveness.

Authors:  Erica Schipper; Camran Nezhat
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2012-07-31

Review 10.  Surgical complications of laparoscopic urological surgery.

Authors:  Michael S Lasser; Reza Ghavamian
Journal:  Arab J Urol       Date:  2012-01-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.