Literature DB >> 9563362

Profile changes in patients with class III malocclusions after Delaire mask therapy.

H Kiliçoglu1, Y Kirliç.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to make a detailed evaluation of hard and soft tissue changes after Delaire orthopedic mask therapy (France-Orthodontie). The treatment group, which comprised 16 girls (mean age: 8.65 years, SD: 1.4 years) with skeletal Class III relationships caused by maxillary retrognathism, was compared with an untreated control group of 10 girls (mean age: 9.29 years, SD: 1.4 years). The following results were obtained: (1) After maxillary protraction, the maxilla was displaced anteriorly, whereas the mandible rotated posteriorly; (2) the maxillary incisors moved in the anterior direction, whereas the mandibular incisors moved posteriorly; (3) the mandibular plane angle and anterior lower and total face heights increased; (4) these changes were reflected in the profile, whereby the skeletal profile convexity increased and soft tissue facial angle and facial convexity decreased; and (5) the Class III concave profile became more balanced, with the upper lip area becoming more marked.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9563362     DOI: 10.1016/s0889-5406(98)80018-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  17 in total

1.  Comparison of the soft and hard tissue effects of two different protraction mechanisms in class III patients: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Mevlut Celikoglu; Ibrahim Yavuz; Tuba Unal; Husamettin Oktay; Abdulvahit Erdem
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Comparison of two protocols for maxillary protraction: bone anchors versus face mask with rapid maxillary expansion.

Authors:  Lucia Cevidanes; Tiziano Baccetti; Lorenzo Franchi; James A McNamara; Hugo De Clerck
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.079

3.  Do we get better outcomes from early treatment of Class III discrepancies?

Authors:  Andrew T DiBiase; Jadbinder Seehra; Spyridon N Papageorgiou; Martyn T Cobourne
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2022-08-12       Impact factor: 2.727

4.  Soft tissue evaluation after maxillary protraction with RPE or with the ALT-RAMEC protocol : A controlled 3D study.

Authors:  Elvan Onem Ozbilen; Mustafa Onur Ari; Hanife Nuray Yilmaz; Sibel Biren
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2022-09-28       Impact factor: 2.341

5.  Evaluation of Skeletal and Dental Effects of Modified Jasper Jumper Appliance and Delaire Face Mask with Pancherz Analysis.

Authors:  Hülya Kılıçoğlu; Nilüfer Yılmaz Öğütlü; Ceylan Alioğlu Uludağ
Journal:  Turk J Orthod       Date:  2017-03-01

6.  Early Treatment of Class III Malocclusion: A Boon or a Burden?

Authors:  Mohammadi Begum Khan; Arjun Karra
Journal:  Int J Clin Pediatr Dent       Date:  2014-08-29

7.  The Effects of Maxillary Protraction with or without Rapid Maxillary Expansion and Age Factors in Treating Class III Malocclusion: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Wei Zhang; Hong-Chen Qu; Mo Yu; Yang Zhang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-11       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Profile Changes and Stability following Distraction Osteogenesis with Rigid External Distraction in Adult Cleft Lip and Palate Deformities.

Authors:  Jaeson M Painatt; Ravi Veeraraghavan; Ushass Puthalath; Sherry Peter; Latha P Rao; Maria Kuriakose
Journal:  Contemp Clin Dent       Date:  2017 Apr-Jun

9.  Photogrammetric Comparison of Facial Soft Tissue Profile before and after Protraction Facemask Therapy in Class III Children (6-11 Years Old).

Authors:  Vahid Moshkelgosha; Arghavan Raoof; Ahmadreza Sardarian; Parisa Salehi
Journal:  J Dent (Shiraz)       Date:  2017-03

Review 10.  Effect of protraction facemask on the temporomandibular joint: a systematic review.

Authors:  Xinqi Huang; Xiao Cen; Jun Liu
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2018-03-12       Impact factor: 2.757

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.