Literature DB >> 9561469

Mycobacterium terrae: a potential surrogate for Mycobacterium tuberculosis in a standard disinfectant test.

P A Griffiths1, J R Babb, A P Fraise.   

Abstract

The susceptibility of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Mycobacterium avium-intracellulare to the disinfections used for spillage and heat sensitive instruments has received much attention in recent years. The use of clinical isolates of M. tuberculosis and M. avium-intracellulare as test organisms is considered unsuitable for standard tests due to their hazardous nature (category 3 pathogens and slow growth rates). This has led to much debate in standards committees on the selection and use of a possible surrogate which would be safer and more practical to use and yet mimic the susceptibility of clinical isolates. This study compared the susceptibility of one possible surrogate Mycobacterium terrae NCTC 10856, with that of clinical isolates of M. tuberculosis H37 Rv and M. avium-intracellulare using a quantitative suspension test. The instrument and environmental disinfectants tested were a chlorine-releasing agent, sodium dichloroisocyanyurate (NaDCC) at 1000 ppm and 10,000 ppm av. Cl, chlorine dioxide at 1100 ppm av. ClO2 (Tristel, HayMan MediChem), 0.35% peracetic acid (NuCidex, Johnson & Johnson), 70% industrial methylated spirit (IMS), 2% alkaline glutaraldehyde (Asep, Galen), 10% succine dialdehyde and formaldehyde mixture (Gigasept, Schulke and Mayr). Results showed that the clinical isolate of M. avium-intracellulare was the most resistant of the three test organisms. M. terrae, which is not a category 3 pathogen, was slightly more resistant than M. tuberculosis and this would appear to be a suitable surrogate for establishing tuberculocidal activity. However, with an increase in the clinical significance of M. avium-intracellulare, particularly in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and immunocompromised patients, a more resistant surrogate is required. In the absence of such a surrogate, testing with M. avium-intracellulare in a clinical laboratory equipped for handling category 3 pathogens is still advised to establish mycobactericidal activity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9561469     DOI: 10.1016/s0195-6701(98)90273-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hosp Infect        ISSN: 0195-6701            Impact factor:   3.926


  12 in total

1.  Hospital infections in Birmingham, England, in the 19th and 20th centuries.

Authors:  Christina R Bradley; Gaj Ayliffe
Journal:  J Infect Prev       Date:  2018-08-22

2.  Minimum inhibitory concentrations of herbal essential oils and monolaurin for gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria.

Authors:  Harry G Preuss; Bobby Echard; Mary Enig; Itzhak Brook; Thomas B Elliott
Journal:  Mol Cell Biochem       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 3.396

3.  Rapid screening method for Mycobactericidal activity of chemical germicides that uses Mycobacterium terrae expressing a green fluorescent protein gene.

Authors:  A A Zafer; Y E Taylor; S A Sattar
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  In Vitro Evaluation of Povidone-Iodine and Chlorhexidine against Outbreak and Nonoutbreak Strains of Mycobacterium abscessus Using Standard Quantitative Suspension and Carrier Testing.

Authors:  Aristine Cheng; Hsin-Yun Sun; Yi-Tzu Tsai; Un-In Wu; Yu-Chung Chuang; Jann-Tay Wang; Wang-Huei Sheng; Po-Ren Hsueh; Yee-Chun Chen; Shan-Chwen Chang
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2017-12-21       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  The efficacy of commercial decontamination agents differs between standardised test settings and research laboratory usage for a variety of bacterial species.

Authors:  Benedict Uy; Hannah Read; Shara van de Pas; Rebecca Marnane; Francesca Casu; Simon Swift; Siouxsie Wiles
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2022-07-15       Impact factor: 3.061

6.  Investigation on Potential ESKAPE Surrogates for 222 and 254 nm Irradiation Experiments.

Authors:  Anna-Maria Gierke; Martin Hessling
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 6.064

7.  Disinfective process of strongly acidic electrolyzed product of sodium chloride solution against Mycobacteria.

Authors:  Tomoyo Matsushita Yamamoto; Takashi Nakano; Masaki Yamaguchi; Mitsuhide Shimizu; Hong Wu; Hiroaki Aoki; Rie Ota; Toyohide Kobayashi; Kouichi Sano
Journal:  Med Mol Morphol       Date:  2012-12-07       Impact factor: 2.309

8.  Rapid evaluation of the mycobactericidal efficacy of disinfectants in the quantitative carrier test EN 14563 by using fluorescent Mycobacterium terrae.

Authors:  Katrin Steinhauer; Iris Eschenbacher; Nadine Radischat; Christian Detsch; Michael Niederweis; Peter Goroncy-Bermes
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2009-11-30       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  Evaluation of mycobactericidal activity of selected chemical disinfectants and antiseptics according to European standards.

Authors:  Ewa Bocian; Wanda Grzybowska; Stefan Tyski
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2014-04-22

10.  Use of green fluorescent protein labeled non-tuberculous mycobacteria to evaluate the activity quaternary ammonium compound disinfectants and antibiotics.

Authors:  Claudia Cortesia; Teresita Bello; Gustavo Lopez; Scott Franzblau; Jacobus de Waard; Howard Takiff
Journal:  Braz J Microbiol       Date:  2016-10-11       Impact factor: 2.476

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.