Literature DB >> 9560042

Infant Flow Driver or single prong nasal continuous positive airway pressure: short-term physiological effects.

J S Ahluwalia1, D K White, C J Morley.   

Abstract

The effectiveness of single prong nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) was compared with the Infant Flow Driver (IFD) in a crossover study in 20 neonates treated with > or = 30% oxygen by nasal CPAP. They were randomized to the device used at the start of the study. Each infant was studied for four consecutive 2-h periods alternating between single prong nasal CPAP and the IFD. The FiO2 from the IFD read 0.02 higher than the same setting on the ventilators used for single prong nasal CPAP. The IFD improved the mean (95% CI) of the FiO2 by 0.05 (0.02-0.08), p = 0.008. Taking into account the systematic error in the FiO2 between the devices the real mean improvement in FiO2 produced by the IFD was 0.03 (-0.005 to 0.06), p=0.09. There were no significant differences in respiratory rate, heart rate, blood pressure or comfort score of infants during periods of single nasal prong CPAP compared with periods on the IFD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9560042     DOI: 10.1080/08035259850157408

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Paediatr        ISSN: 0803-5253            Impact factor:   2.299


  9 in total

Review 1.  Continuous distending pressure.

Authors:  C Morley
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 5.747

Review 2.  Nasal CPAP for neonates: what do we know in 2003?

Authors:  A G De Paoli; C Morley; P G Davis
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 5.747

3.  In vitro comparison of nasal continuous positive airway pressure devices for neonates.

Authors:  A G De Paoli; C J Morley; P G Davis; R Lau; E Hingeley
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 5.747

Review 4.  Changing trends in the management of respiratory distress syndrome (RDS).

Authors:  Praveen Kumar; P S Sandesh Kiran
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 1.967

5.  A randomised control study comparing the Infant Flow Driver with nasal continuous positive airway pressure in preterm infants.

Authors:  M Mazzella; C Bellini; M G Calevo; F Campone; D Massocco; P Mezzano; E Zullino; F Scopesi; C Arioni; W Bonacci; G Serra
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 5.747

6.  A randomised controlled trial of two methods of delivering nasal continuous positive airway pressure after extubation to infants weighing less than 1000 g: binasal (Hudson) versus single nasal prongs.

Authors:  P Davis; M Davies; B Faber
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 5.747

Review 7.  Risks and benefits of therapies for apnoea in premature infants.

Authors:  J M Hascoet; I Hamon; M J Boutroy
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 5.606

8.  Comparison of two different CPAP systems by tidal breathing parameters.

Authors:  Thomas Hückstädt; Bertram Foitzik; Roland R Wauer; Gerd Schmalisch
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2003-05-27       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 9.  Devices and pressure sources for administration of nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) in preterm neonates.

Authors:  A G De Paoli; P G Davis; B Faber; C J Morley
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2008-01-23
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.