Literature DB >> 9559633

Rectal wall contractility in response to an evoked urge to defecate in patients with obstructed defecation.

W R Schouten1, M J Gosselink, M O Boerma, A Z Ginai.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to examine rectal sensory perception and rectal wall contractility in response to an evoked urge to defecate and to identify differences between control subjects and patients with obstructed defecation.
METHODS: Twenty control patients (10 men; median age, 47 (range, 17-78) years) and 29 female patients with disabling obstructed defecation (median age, 48 (range, 18-70) years) entered the study. Under radiologic control, an infinitely compliant barostat balloon was inserted over a guide wire into the proximal part of the rectum. Additionally, a latex balloon was introduced into the distal part of the rectum. This latex balloon was inflated until an urge to defecate was experienced. Simultaneously, rectal wall contractility was assessed by measuring the variations in barostat balloon volume. These variations were expressed as percentage changes from baseline volume.
RESULTS: By comparing controls and patients with obstructed defecation, a significant difference was found regarding mean distending volume required to elicit an urge to defecate (135 +/- 38 vs. 214 +/- 87 ml of air; P < 0.001, Mann-Whitney U-test). In all controls, the evocation of an urge to defecate induced a pronounced increase in rectal tone, proximal to the distal stimulating balloon. By comparing controls and patients, the increase in rectal tone was found to be significantly higher in control subjects (35 +/- 10 vs. 9 +/- 10 percent; P < 0.001). Twenty-five patients (86 percent) showed no or only minimum (<20 percent) increase in rectal tone during the perception of an urge to defecate. In 14 of these patients, the threshold for this perception was increased. Only four patients (14 percent) showed a relatively normal increase (>20 percent) in rectal tone. However, their threshold for perception was greatly increased.
CONCLUSION: The assembly used in this study provides a useful tool for investigation of rectal evacuation. In all of our patients, obstructed defecation was associated with abnormal rectal sensory perception and/or altered rectal wall contractility.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9559633     DOI: 10.1007/BF02235762

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  9 in total

1.  Stapled transanal rectal resection to treat obstructed defecation caused by rectal intussusception and rectocele.

Authors:  A Renzi; D Izzo; G Di Sarno; G Izzo; N Di Martino
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2006-01-13       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 2.  Neurophysiological testing in anorectal disorders.

Authors:  Jose M Remes-Troche; Satish S C Rao
Journal:  Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.869

3.  Defecographic functional evaluation of rectal akinesia.

Authors:  C Morandi; J Martellucci; M Genovese; P Torricelli
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2015-05-05       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 4.  Barostat testing in children with functional gastrointestinal disorders.

Authors:  Maartje M van den Berg; Carlo Di Lorenzo; Rijk van Ginkel; Hayat M Mousa; Marc A Benninga
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2006-06

5.  Laparoscopic correction of enterocele associated to stapled transanal rectal resection for obstructed defecation syndrome.

Authors:  Alfonso Carriero; Marcello Picchio; Jacopo Martellucci; Pasquale Talento; Domenico Palimento; Erasmo Spaziani
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Videodefecography: a study of the rectal motile pattern.

Authors:  A Shafik; A A Shafik; O El-Sibai; Y A Ali
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2003-05-29       Impact factor: 1.246

7.  Stapled trans-anal rectal resection (STARR) by a new dedicated device for the surgical treatment of obstructed defaecation syndrome caused by rectal intussusception and rectocele: early results of a multicenter prospective study.

Authors:  Adolfo Renzi; Pasquale Talento; Cristiano Giardiello; Giovanni Angelone; Domenico Izzo; Giandomenico Di Sarno
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2008-07-25       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Efficacy and Predictors for Biofeedback Therapeutic Outcome in Patients with Dyssynergic Defecation.

Authors:  Ting Yu; Xiaoxue Shen; Miaomiao Li; Meifeng Wang; Lin Lin
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2017-08-29       Impact factor: 2.260

9.  Rectal hyposensitivity.

Authors:  Rebecca E Burgell; S Mark Scott
Journal:  J Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2012-10-09       Impact factor: 4.924

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.