Literature DB >> 9559364

Latitudinal differences in species and community richness and in community structure of metazoan endo- and ectoparasites of marine teleost fish.

K Rohde1, M Heap.   

Abstract

Relative species diversity of gastrointestinal helminths of 55 teleost fish species did not differ significantly at different latitudes, whereas relative species diversity of metazoan ectoparasites on the heads and gills of 108 teleost fish species showed a significant increase with decreasing latitude and from deep to surface waters. Abundance of endoparasites also was the same at all latitudes, whereas abundance of ectoparasites increased with decreasing latitude and from deep to shallow waters. A comparative analysis using phylogenetically independent contrasts supported these conclusions. Possible reasons for the differences between endo- and ectoparasites are discussed. A detailed analysis of the community structure of gastrointestinal helminths of five Antarctic and three tropical teleosts and of metazoan ectoparasites on the heads and gills of five Antarctic and seven tropical fish species showed the following: abundance and prevalence of infection of endoparasites are similar in Antarctic and tropical fish, but are much greater for tropical than for Antarctic ectoparasites. Relative species diversity of endoparasites is similar for Antarctic and tropical endoparasites, but much greater for tropical than Antarctic ectoparasites. In both Antarctic and tropical fish, different fish of the same species may have different dominant species of endo- and ectoparasites, although there is a greater range of dominant species of tropical ectoparasites, a consequence of the greater species pool available. The most dominant parasite (irrespective of species) represented 80-99% of all endoparasites of Antarctic, and about 50-80% of all endoparasites of tropical fish. The most dominant parasites (irrespective of species) represented about 90-100% of all ectoparasites of Antarctic, and about 20-70% of all ectoparasites of tropical fish, the difference a consequence of the greater species pool of tropical ectoparasites available. The data suggest that both endo- and ectoparasites live in assemblages not structured by interspecific competition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9559364     DOI: 10.1016/s0020-7519(97)00209-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Parasitol        ISSN: 0020-7519            Impact factor:   3.981


  18 in total

1.  The relationship between species richness and productivity in metazoan parasite communities.

Authors:  Robert Poulin; David Mouillot; Mario George-Nascimento
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2003-07-22       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  May Rapoport's rule apply to human associated pathogens?

Authors:  Vanina Guernier; Jean-François Guégan
Journal:  Ecohealth       Date:  2010-03-23       Impact factor: 3.184

3.  Monthly variation in the parasite communities of the intertidal fish Scartichthys viridis (Blenniidae) from central Chile: are there seasonal patterns?

Authors:  Gabriela Muñoz; Haseeb S Randhawa
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2011-01-11       Impact factor: 2.289

4.  Parasites of Urophycis brasiliensis (Gadiformes: Phycidae) as indicators of marine ecoregions in coastal areas of the South American Atlantic.

Authors:  Aldenice N Pereira; Camila Pantoja; José L Luque; Juan T Timi
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2014-09-24       Impact factor: 2.289

5.  Maintenance of MHC Class IIB diversity in a recently established songbird population.

Authors:  Danielle J Whittaker; Amy L Dapper; Mark P Peterson; Jonathan W Atwell; Ellen D Ketterson
Journal:  J Avian Biol       Date:  2012-03-08       Impact factor: 2.327

6.  Infectious disease, shifting climates, and opportunistic predators: cumulative factors potentially impacting wild salmon declines.

Authors:  Kristina M Miller; Amy Teffer; Strahan Tucker; Shaorong Li; Angela D Schulze; Marc Trudel; Francis Juanes; Amy Tabata; Karia H Kaukinen; Norma G Ginther; Tobi J Ming; Steven J Cooke; J Mark Hipfner; David A Patterson; Scott G Hinch
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2014-05-27       Impact factor: 5.183

7.  Determinants and consequences of interspecific body size variation in tetraphyllidean tapeworms.

Authors:  Haseeb Sajjad Randhawa; Robert Poulin
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2009-07-10       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Host introduction and parasites: a case study on the parasite community of the peacock grouper Cephalopholis argus (Serranidae) in the Hawaiian Islands.

Authors:  Matthias Vignon; Pierre Sasal; René Galzin
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2008-11-12       Impact factor: 2.289

9.  Differentiation of flea communities infesting small mammals across selected habitats of the Baltic coast, central lowlands, and southern mountains of Poland.

Authors:  Krzysztof Kowalski; Urszula Eichert; Michał Bogdziewicz; Leszek Rychlik
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2014-03-12       Impact factor: 2.289

10.  Nestedness of ectoparasite-vertebrate host networks.

Authors:  Sean P Graham; Hassan K Hassan; Nathan D Burkett-Cadena; Craig Guyer; Thomas R Unnasch
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-11-18       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.