Literature DB >> 9558684

Hemodynamic benefits of right ventricular outflow tract pacing: comparison with right ventricular apex pacing.

C C de Cock1, A Meyer, O Kamp, C A Visser.   

Abstract

To assess optimal hemodynamics in relation to stimulation site during right ventricular pacing, 17 consecutive patients who underwent cardiac catheterization were studied. In all patients, right ventricular apex and right ventricular outflow tract stimulation was performed at 85, 100, and 120 beats/min. Cardiac index at both pacing sites was compared using the left ventricular outflow tract continuous wave Doppler technique. Comparison of the two stimulation sites demonstrated that right ventricular outflow tract pacing resulted in a higher cardiac index at 85 beats/min (2.42 +/- 1.2 vs 2.04 +/- 1.0 L/min per m2, P < 0.002) at 100 beats/min (2.78 +/- 1.4 vs 2.35 +/- 1.1 L/min per m2, P < 0.001) and 120 beats/min (3.00 +/- 1.5 vs 2.61 +/- 0.9 L/min per m2, P < 0.001). From a total of 51 paired observations, 45 showed an increase in cardiac index during outflow tract pacing as compared to apex pacing. Right ventricular outflow tract pacing at 120 beats/min resulted in a lower cardiac index than right ventricular apex pacing in patients with significant coronary artery disease and/or impaired left ventricular function (ejection fraction < or = 50%), whereas right ventricular outflow tract pacing produced higher cardiac indices in the absence of these abnormalities. Right ventricular outflow tract pacing resulted in higher cardiac indices as compared to apex pacing in all other subgroups at all other pacing sites tested. It is concluded that stimulation of the right ventricular outflow tract offers a significant hemodynamic benefit during single chamber pacing as compared to conventional apex pacing, particularly in the absence of significant coronary artery disease and/or left ventricular dysfunction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9558684     DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1998.tb00095.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol        ISSN: 0147-8389            Impact factor:   1.976


  14 in total

1.  Comparison of the acute hemodynamic effect of right ventricular apex, outflow tract, and dual-site right ventricular pacing.

Authors:  Andrzej Rubaj; Piotr Rucinski; Tomasz Sodolski; Andrzej Bilan; Marcin Gulaj; Alicja Dabrowska-Kugacka; Andrzej Kutarski
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.468

Review 2.  [His-bundle stimulation and alternative RV stimulation sites].

Authors:  G Fröhlig; M Kindermann
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2008-03

3.  Implantation of lumenless pacing leads at the inter-atrial septum and right ventricular outflow tract with deflectable catheter-sheath.

Authors:  Rong Bai; Ruth Kam; Chi Keong Ching; Li Fern Hsu; Wee Siong Teo
Journal:  J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci       Date:  2008-12-24

4.  Selective site pacing: rationale and practical application.

Authors:  Sameer Parekh; Kenneth M Stein
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 5.  Do arrhythmias still deserve our intellectual efforts?: The 2002 Wenckebach Lecture of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology.

Authors:  N M van Hemel
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 2.380

6.  Current concepts in pacing 2010-2011: the right and wrong way to pace.

Authors:  Simon Modi; Andrew Krahn; Raymond Yee
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2011-10

Review 7.  Right Ventricular Versus Biventricular Pacing for Heart Failure and Atrioventricular Block.

Authors:  Hiroko Beck; Anne B Curtis
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2016-10

8.  Health-related quality of life relative to clinical outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation treated with ventricular rate stabilisation pacing.

Authors:  M A M Stofmeel; N M van Hemel; J C Kelder; R Yee; R E Labonté; M Taborsky; D E Grobbee
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 2.380

9.  Development of mitral and tricuspid regurgitation in right ventricular apex versus right ventricular outflow tract pacing.

Authors:  Sevil Hemayat; Akbar Shafiee; Saeed Oraii; Farideh Roshanali; Farshid Alaedini; Amirhossein Sami Aldoboni
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2014-03-14       Impact factor: 1.900

10.  Comparison of ventricular dyssynchrony according to the position of right ventricular pacing electrode: a multi-center prospective echocardiographic study.

Authors:  Goo-Yeong Cho; Mi-Jeong Kim; Jae-Hyeong Park; Hyun-Sook Kim; Hyun Ju Youn; Kye-Hun Kim; Jae-Kwan Song
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Ultrasound       Date:  2011-03-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.