N R Kressin1, K A Atchison, D R Miller. 1. Center for Health Quality, Outcomes, and Economic Research, VAMC, Bedford, MA 01730, USA. nkressin@bu.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: This study compares the distributional and psychometric properties of the Geriatric Oral Health Assessment Index (GOHAI) in two samples of older adults, and examines how the self-perceived impact of oral disease, as measured by the GOHAI, varies in accordance with sample sociodemographic and health characteristics. METHODS: Results are based on survey data from two samples of older men: a Medicare sample of patients using community physicians (n = 799; mean age = 74) and users of VA ambulatory health care (n = 542; mean age = 72). RESULTS: The findings indicate significant differences between samples in mean GOHAI scores, with the VA sample exhibiting worse scores. A number of similarities in psychometric properties of the instrument across the two samples were found: high internal consistency reliability and similar inter-item and item-scale correlations. Factors analyses revealed somewhat different structures between the two samples, but explained similar amounts of variance; regression analyses indicated that income and self-rated oral health were significant predictors of GOHAI scores in both samples. CONCLUSIONS: The GOHAI exhibits satisfactory psychometric properties in both samples of older men. Results suggest continued use of the GOHAI as an indicator of the impact of oral conditions on functioning and well-being in a variety of samples.
OBJECTIVES: This study compares the distributional and psychometric properties of the Geriatric Oral Health Assessment Index (GOHAI) in two samples of older adults, and examines how the self-perceived impact of oral disease, as measured by the GOHAI, varies in accordance with sample sociodemographic and health characteristics. METHODS: Results are based on survey data from two samples of older men: a Medicare sample of patients using community physicians (n = 799; mean age = 74) and users of VA ambulatory health care (n = 542; mean age = 72). RESULTS: The findings indicate significant differences between samples in mean GOHAI scores, with the VA sample exhibiting worse scores. A number of similarities in psychometric properties of the instrument across the two samples were found: high internal consistency reliability and similar inter-item and item-scale correlations. Factors analyses revealed somewhat different structures between the two samples, but explained similar amounts of variance; regression analyses indicated that income and self-rated oral health were significant predictors of GOHAI scores in both samples. CONCLUSIONS: The GOHAI exhibits satisfactory psychometric properties in both samples of older men. Results suggest continued use of the GOHAI as an indicator of the impact of oral conditions on functioning and well-being in a variety of samples.
Authors: Soraya León; Miguel Rivera; Sebastián Payero; Gloria Correa-Beltrán; Fernando N Hugo; Rodrigo A Giacaman Journal: Int Dent J Date: 2018-07-20 Impact factor: 2.607
Authors: Maria Augusta Bessa Rebelo; Evangeline Maria Cardoso; Peter G Robinson; Mario Vianna Vettore Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2015-12-26 Impact factor: 4.147