Literature DB >> 9558140

New modified fluorescence polarization immunoassay does not falsely elevate vancomycin concentrations in patients with end-stage renal disease.

P F Smith1, W P Petros, M P Soucie, K R Copeland.   

Abstract

Recent literature has urged caution in the interpretation of vancomycin serum concentrations in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD), because falsely elevated levels in excess of 70% have been reported with the most commonly used fluorescence polarization immunoassay (FPIA). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance of a recently modified FPIA assay for use in patients with ESRD, in comparison to high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and an enzyme-mediated immunoassay technique (EMIT). Serum vancomycin samples were prospectively collected from adults with ESRD undergoing chronic hemodialysis. Each sample was stored at -70 degrees C until analyzed in duplicate by FPIA, EMIT, and HPLC. In an in vitro experiment, blank serum samples with 15 microg/ml vancomycin were spiked with increasing amounts of CDP and analyzed in duplicate with the modified FPIA assay. When compared to HPLC, no statistically significant difference was found in patients with ESRD with the use of the modified FPIA assay (mean concentrations, HPLC 14.92 microg/ml, FPIA 15.96 microg/ml), with FPIA exhibiting a positive bias of 0.64 microg/ml and a precision of +/-3.49 microg/ml (n = 18, p = 0.44). The mean EMIT concentration was 18.34 microg/ml, with a positive bias of 3.43 microg/ml and a precision of +/-5.17 microg/ml (p < 0.01). The addition of increasing amounts of CDP to vancomycin in vitro resulted in concentrations similar to those expected in the absence of significant cross-reactivity with the modified FPIA assay. The modified FPIA assay is a satisfactory tool for monitoring vancomycin serum concentrations in patients with ESRD undergoing hemodialysis. Results obtained with EMIT were not as precise as with FPIA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9558140     DOI: 10.1097/00007691-199804000-00016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ther Drug Monit        ISSN: 0163-4356            Impact factor:   3.681


  6 in total

1.  Therapeutic drug monitoring of antimicrobials.

Authors:  Jason A Roberts; Ross Norris; David L Paterson; Jennifer H Martin
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 4.335

2.  Therapeutic drug monitoring of vancomycin in patients receiving haemodialysis: time for a change.

Authors:  F Fitzpatrick; T McGaley; L Rajan; R Crowley; M Turley; H Humphreys; E Smyth
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 3.  Vancomycin: pharmacokinetics and administration regimens in neonates.

Authors:  Matthijs de Hoog; Johan W Mouton; John N van den Anker
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 6.447

4.  Vancomycin and meropenem in acrylic cement: elution kinetics of in vitro bactericidal action.

Authors:  Agnese Andollina; Giorgia Bertoni; Franco Bertoni; Carola Zolezzi; Federico Trentani; Paolo Trentani; Anna Maria Borrelli; Domenico Tigani
Journal:  Chir Organi Mov       Date:  2008-05-21

5.  Catalysis of electro-oxidation of antibiotics by nitroxyl radicals and the electrochemical sensing of vancomycin.

Authors:  Tetsuya Ono; Kyoko Sugiyama; Sachiko Komatsu; Masayuki Kumano; Kentaro Yoshida; Takenori Dairaku; Tsutomu Fujimura; Yusuke Sasano; Yoshiharu Iwabuchi; Yoshitomo Kashiwagi; Katsuhiko Sato
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2021-06-18       Impact factor: 3.361

6.  Does Beta-lactam Pharmacokinetic Variability in Critically Ill Patients Justify Therapeutic Drug Monitoring? A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Fekade Bruck Sime; Michael S Roberts; Sandra L Peake; Jeffrey Lipman; Jason A Roberts
Journal:  Ann Intensive Care       Date:  2012-07-28       Impact factor: 6.925

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.