Literature DB >> 9556908

Context reinforcement degrades discriminative control: a memory approach.

D S Blough1.   

Abstract

This study measured effects of context reinforcement on a visual discrimination. Five pigeons responded to 1 key in the presence of 6 shorter wavelengths and to another key for 6 longer wavelengths. Psychometric functions provided measures of discriminative sensitivity (d') and overall stimulus control. Sensitivity and control were slightly but significantly better when 20% of correct choices yielded reinforcement than when 5% did. Reinforcement of pecks to the sample stimulus reduced control substantially and sensitivity slightly; noncontingent reinforcement during intertrial intervals also reduced control, whether such reinforcement was signaled or not. Accuracy was excellent during an extinction session, but it fell substantially when reinforcement for sample pecks was added during choice extinction. Simulations based on a memory model of the discrimination process reproduced most of the experimental findings.

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9556908     DOI: 10.1037//0097-7403.24.2.185

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process        ISSN: 0097-7403


  11 in total

1.  Psychophysics of remembering.

Authors:  K G White; J T Wixted
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Accuracy of discrimination, rate of responding, and resistance to change.

Authors:  John A Nevin; Jessica Milo; Amy L Odum; Timothy A Shahan
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Reaction time signatures of discriminative processes: differential effects of stimulus similarity and incentive.

Authors:  Donald S Blough
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 1.986

4.  Processing of conflicting and redundant stimulus information by pigeons.

Authors:  Kumiko Yokoyama; Deena Dailey; Sheila Chase
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 1.986

5.  Disruption of temporal discrimination and the choose-short effect.

Authors:  Ryan D Ward; Amy L Odum
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 1.986

6.  Contrast effects in response rate and accuracy of delayed matching to sample.

Authors:  John A Nevin; Timothy A Shahan; Amy L Odum
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 2.143

7.  An instance theory of associative learning.

Authors:  Randall K Jamieson; Matthew J C Crump; Samuel D Hannah
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 1.986

8.  Metacognition in animals.

Authors:  Jonathon D Crystal; Allison L Foote
Journal:  Comp Cogn Behav Rev       Date:  2009

Review 9.  A random-walk interpretation of incentive effects in visual discrimination.

Authors:  Donald S Blough
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2010-08-11       Impact factor: 1.777

10.  Reaction times identify a Pavlovian component in a two-choice discrimination.

Authors:  Donald S Blough
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2009-02-03       Impact factor: 1.777

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.