Literature DB >> 9556247

Clinical outcome and bowel function following total abdominal colectomy and ileorectal anastomosis in the Oriental population.

K W Eu1, S L Lim, F Seow-Choen, A F Leong, Y H Ho.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Total abdominal colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis is a commonly performed surgical procedure. The postoperative outcome of these patients, however, has not been studied in detail in the Asian population. AIM: The purpose of this study was to analyze the functional outcome of patients following total abdominal colectomy and ileorectal anastomosis.
METHOD: All patients subjected to a total abdominal colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis during a six-year period from February 1989 to October 1995 were reviewed.
RESULTS: Sixty-six patients (male:female, 40:26) with a mean age of 55.2 (range, 20-88) years underwent total abdominal colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis. Median follow-up after surgery was 26 (range, 4-78) months. Indications for surgery were synchronous or metachronous tumors (18), complicated pancolonic diverticular disease (15), obstructed tumors with impending perforation (13), familial adenomatous polyposis (7), slow-transit constipation (6), and others (7). Mean operative time was 137 +/- 48 minutes. Mean postoperative hospitalization was 13.3 +/- 11.9 days. Time to first bowel movement and commencement of solid diet were 4.7 +/- 1.8 and 7.2 +/- 2.4 days, respectively. Four patients had prolonged postoperative ileus. Average stool frequencies per day were 5.5 at one week, 4.3 at one month, 3.9 at six months, 3.2 at one year, and 2.9 at two years postoperatively. Thirty-three patients (50 percent) required antidiarrheal treatment for a transient period, but none required long-term therapy. Ninety-seven percent of all patients rated the functional outcome as good to excellent, and 3 percent said it was fair. There was two perioperative mortalities. Five cases required re-laparotomy, three for anastomotic complications and two for hemoperitoneum. Five patients had recurrent admissions for adhesion colic, which resolved with nonsurgical therapy. Ten patients succumbed on follow-up, six to tumor recurrence, two to unrelated cancers (stomach and bladder), and three to medical conditions.
CONCLUSION: The functional outcome of ileorectal anastomosis is generally rated as good to excellent by patients. Acceptable bowel function and control is regained within six months of the operation and levels off at one year after surgery, and no patient requires long-term antidiarrheal medication.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9556247     DOI: 10.1007/BF02238251

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  10 in total

1.  Does a laparoscopic approach to total abdominal colectomy and proctocolectomy offer advantages?

Authors:  P A Seshadri; E C Poulin; C M Schlachta; M O Cadeddu; J Mamazza
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-05-07       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  A surgical solution to regain bowel continuity following an extended left colectomy-reviving and extending the indication for a "Flip-Flop" procedure.

Authors:  Ronen Ghinea; Shmuel Avital; Ephraim Katz; Baruch Shpitz; Ian White
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2017-10-28       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Functional results and visceral perception after ileo neo-rectal anastomosis in patients: a pilot study.

Authors:  G I Andriesse; H G Gooszen; M E Schipper; L M Akkermans; T J van Vroonhoven; C J van Laarhoven
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 23.059

4.  Comparison of defecatory function after laparoscopic total colectomy and ileorectal anastomosis versus a traditional open approach.

Authors:  Mas Khan; D Jayne; R Saunders
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2018-01-24       Impact factor: 1.891

5.  Short-term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open total colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis: a case-matched analysis from a nationwide database.

Authors:  A Onder; C Benlice; J Church; H Kessler; E Gorgun
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2016-10-25       Impact factor: 3.781

6.  Laparoscopic vs open total colectomy: a case-matched comparative study.

Authors:  N Pokala; C P Delaney; A J Senagore; K M Brady; V W Fazio
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-03-11       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Rectal and pouch recurrences after surgical treatment for familial adenomatous polyposis.

Authors:  Fabio Guilherme Campos; Antonio Rocco Imperiale; Víctor Edmond Seid; Rodrigo Oliva Perez; Afonso Henrique da Silva e Sousa; Desidério Roberto Kiss; Angelita Habr-Gama; Ivan Cecconello
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2008-09-03       Impact factor: 3.452

8.  Laparoscopic total colectomy for colonic inertia: surgical and functional results.

Authors:  George Pinedo; Alejandro Jose Zarate; Eduardo Garcia; Maria Elena Molina; Francisco Lopez; Alvaro Zúñiga
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-04-10       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Health behaviors in patients and families with hereditary colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Allison M Burton; Shelly R Hovick; Susan K Peterson
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2012-06

10.  Clinicopathological features and surgical options for synchronous colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Byoung Chul Lee; Chang Sik Yu; Jihun Kim; Jong Lyul Lee; Chan Wook Kim; Yong Sik Yoon; In Ja Park; Seok-Byung Lim; Jin Cheon Kim
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 1.889

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.