Literature DB >> 9556235

Effects of pneumoperitoneum on tumor implantation with decreasing tumor inoculum.

J S Wu1, D B Jones, L W Guo, E B Brasfield, M B Ruiz, J M Connett, J W Fleshman.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to determine the effect of pneumoperitoneum on the rate of trocar-site implantation with decreasing inoculum of cancer cells.
METHODS: A total of 0.5 ml of GW-39 human colon cancer cell suspensions at 1 percent (approximately 3.2 x 10(5) cells) and at 0.5 percent (approximately 1.6 x 10(5) cells; v/v) were injected into the abdomen of hamsters through a midline incision. Animals in each group were randomized to receive either pneumoperitoneum (1 percent = 33; 0.5 percent = 43) or not (1 percent = 32; 0.5 percent = 39). Gross and microscopic tumor implants were documented seven weeks later at four trocar sites.
RESULTS: In the 1 percent group, pneumoperitoneum significantly increased trocar-site tumor implants from 50 to 71 percent (P < 0.001). Pneumoperitoneum also resulted in the following: 1) more frequent involvement of all four concurrent sites (38 vs. 10 percent; P < 0.02); 2) more frequent palpable tumors (13 vs. 5 percent; P < 0.01); 3) larger tumor mass (2.1 +/- 0.6 g vs. 0.2 +/- 0.1 g; P < 0.02). In the 0.5 percent group, pneumoperitoneum did not significantly increase trocar-site tumor implants, and it did not result in a larger tumor mass. The percent increase in trocar-site implants owing to pneumoperitoneum was influenced by the amount of tumor inoculum (21 percent in the 1 percent group; 10 percent in the 0.5 percent group). The mass of palpable tumor implants after pneumoperitoneum decreased with decreased inoculum: 1 percent = 2.1 +/- 0.6 g; 0.5 percent = 0.3 +/- 0.1 g (P < 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: Pneumoperitoneum significantly increased both tumor implantation rate and mass when approximately 3.2 x 10(5) colon cancer cells were injected into the peritoneal cavity. These effects of pneumoperitoneum diminished with one-half as many tumor cells injected in the peritoneal cavity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9556235     DOI: 10.1007/BF02238239

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  10 in total

1.  Comparison of short, long-term surgical outcomes and mid-term health-related quality of life after laparoscopic and open resection for colorectal cancer: a case-matched control study.

Authors:  Shoichi Fujii; Mitsuyoshi Ota; Yasushi Ichikawa; Shigeru Yamagishi; Kazuteru Watanabe; Kenji Tatsumi; Jun Watanabe; Hirokazu Suwa; Takashi Oshima; Chikara Kunisaki; Shigeo Ohki; Itaru Endo; Hiroshi Shimada
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2010-06-09       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Experimental assessment of tumor growth and dissemination of a microscopic peritoneal carcinomatosis after CO2 peritoneal insufflation or laparotomy.

Authors:  E Fondrinier; M Boisdron-Celle; A Chassevent; G Lorimier; E Gamelin
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-05-07       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Validation of a new experimental model of colon cancer.

Authors:  C Balague; C Braumann; K Führer; H Guski; C A Jacobi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-05-07       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Pneumoperitoneum does not influence trocar site implantation during tumor manipulation in a solid tumor model.

Authors:  V J Halpin; R A Underwood; D Ye; D H Cooper; M Wright; S M Hickerson; W C Connett; J M Connett; J W Fleshman
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-10-05       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Patterns of recurrence and survival after laparoscopic and conventional resections for colorectal carcinoma.

Authors:  J E Hartley; B J Mehigan; A W MacDonald; P W Lee; J R Monson
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open radical distal gastrectomy with extended lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer management.

Authors:  W Ziqiang; Q Feng; C Zhimin; W Miao; Q Lian; L Huaxing; Y Peiwu
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-10-05       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 7.  Alterations in the immune system and tumor growth in laparoscopy.

Authors:  J E Hartley; B J Mehigan; J R Monson
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2000-12-12       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Laparoscopic total mesorectal excision: a consecutive series of 100 patients.

Authors:  Mario Morino; Umberto Parini; Giuseppe Giraudo; Micky Salval; Riccardo Brachet Contul; Corrado Garrone
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Does carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum enhance wound metastases following laparoscopic abdominal tumor surgery? A meta-analysis of 20 randomized control studies.

Authors:  Xianwei Mo; Yang Yang; Hao Lai; Jun Xiao; Ke He; Jiansi Chen; Yuan Lin
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2014-04-18

10.  More Reasonable Animal Model for Study the Effect of Pneumoperitoneum on Abdominal Tumor Cells

Authors:  Lv Qijun; Wang Chongshu
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2018-01-27
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.