Literature DB >> 9555212

Clinical and quantitative marginal analysis of feldspathic ceramic inlays at 4 years.

K H Friedl1, K A Hiller, G Schmalz, B Bey.   

Abstract

The aim of this clinical study was to evaluate feldspathic ceramic inlays both by clinical criteria and quantitative margin analysis in continuation of an earlier, identically conducted 2-year study. Fifty feldspathic ceramic inlays were adhesively luted in Class II preparations with all margins located in enamel. The inlays were evaluated clinically according to modified USPHS criteria after 3 and 4 years. Quantitative margin analysis was performed with a scanning electron microscope (SEM). Clinically, the inlays showed no recurrent caries and no changes in colour, but superficial marginal discolouration (6%) was apparent after 4 years. Margins were perceptible clinically in 64% of the cases after 4 years. Quantitative margin analysis showed significantly more marginal gaps at the composite/ceramic interface than at the enamel/composite interface, There was neither a significant decrease in perfect margins nor a significant increase in marginal gaps and marginal imperfections at both interfaces between the third and fourth year. Clinically, the inlays performed very well up to 4 years. Clinical evaluation using an explorer only detected substance loss in the cementation gap. The SEM evaluation showed significantly higher changes in marginal qualities during the first 2-year interval of clinical service compared to the second 2-year interval following an exponential mathematical regularity. Quantitative margin analysis should be included in clinical long-term trials to detect early marginal deficiencies at the luting interfaces.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9555212     DOI: 10.1007/s007840050028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Investig        ISSN: 1432-6981            Impact factor:   3.573


  4 in total

1.  What type of filling? Best practice in dental restorations.

Authors:  B L Chadwick; P M Dummer; F D Dunstan; A S Gilmour; R J Jones; C J Phillips; J Rees; S Richmond; J Stevens; E T Treasure
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1999-09

Review 2.  Systematic review of ceramic inlays.

Authors:  M Hayashi; N H F Wilson; C A Yeung; H V Worthington
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2002-12-21       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Partial ceramic crowns. Influence of preparation design and luting material on margin integrity--a scanning electron microscopic study.

Authors:  Marianne Federlin; C Sipos; K-A Hiller; B Thonemann; G Schmalz
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2004-08-10       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Proximal direct composite restorations and chairside CAD/CAM inlays: marginal adaptation of a two-step self-etch adhesive with and without selective enamel conditioning.

Authors:  T Bortolotto; I Onisor; I Krejci
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2006-10-10       Impact factor: 3.573

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.