Literature DB >> 9554929

Prognostic significance of pathological response of primary tumor and metastatic axillary lymph nodes after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced breast carcinoma.

M R Machiavelli1, A O Romero, J E Pérez, J A Lacava, M E Domínguez, R Rodríguez, M R Barbieri, L A Romero Acuña, J M Romero Acuña, M J Langhi, S Amato, E H Ortiz, C T Vallejo, B A Leone.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The prognostic significance of pathological response of primary tumor and metastatic axillary lymph nodes after neoadjuvant chemotherapy was assessed in patients with noninflammatory locally advanced breast carcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between January 1989 and April 1995, 148 consecutive patients with locally advanced breast carcinoma participated in the study. Of these, 140 fully evaluable patients (67, stage IIIA; 73, stage IIIB) were treated with three courses of 5-fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide (FAC), followed by modified radical mastectomy when technically feasible or definitive radiation therapy. The median age was 53 years (range, 26 to 75 years); 55% of patients were postmenopausal.
RESULTS: Objective response was recorded in 99 of 140 patients (71%; 95% confidence interval, 63% to 79%). Complete response occurred in 11 patients (8%), and partial response occurred in 88 patients (63%). No change was recorded in 37 patients (26%), and progressive disease occurred in 4 patients (3%). One hundred and thirty-six patients underwent the planned surgery. Maximal pathological response of the primary tumor (in situ carcinoma or minimal microscopic residual tumor) was observed in 24 (18%); 112 patients (82%) presented minimal pathological response of the primary tumor (gross residual tumor). The number of metastatic axillary nodes after neoadjuvant chemotherapy was as follows: N0, 39 patients (29%); N1-N3, 35 patients (26%); > N3, 62 patients (45%). Considering the initial TNM status, 75% of the patients had decreases in tumor compartment after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Also, 31% and 23% of patients with clinical N1 and N2, respectively, showed uninvolved axillary lymph nodes. A significant correlation was noted between pathological response of primary tumor and the number of metastatic axillary lymph nodes. Median disease-free survival was 34 months, whereas median overall survival was 66 months. Pathological responses of both primary tumor and metastatic axillary lymph nodes were strongly correlated with disease-free survival and overall survival in univariate analyses. Additionally, in a proportional hazard regression model and in an accelerated failure time model, metastatic axillary lymph nodes significantly influenced both disease-free survival and overall survival, whereas pathological response of primary tumor did so on disease-free survival only.
CONCLUSION: After neoadjuvant chemotherapy, pathological responses of both primary tumor and metastatic axillary lymph nodes had a marked prognostic significance and influenced outcome for patients with locally advanced breast carcinoma. Our results suggest that maximal tumor shrinkage and sterilization of potentially involved axillary nodes may represent a major goal of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Further studies are warranted to clarify whether these results reflect the therapeutic effect or intrinsic biologic factors of the tumor.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9554929

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer J Sci Am        ISSN: 1081-4442


  31 in total

Review 1.  Dose-intensive chemotherapy for locally advanced breast cancer.

Authors:  J G Schrama; S Rodenhuis
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 2.  FDG-PET in monitoring therapy of breast cancer.

Authors:  H-J Biersack; H Bender; H Palmedo
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2004-04-27       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 3.  Measuring response to chemotherapy in locally advanced breast cancer: methodological considerations.

Authors:  Nanda C Krak; Otto S Hoekstra; Adriaan A Lammertsma
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2004-04-22       Impact factor: 9.236

4.  FDG PET/CT for monitoring response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Katharina Dalus; Gundula Rendl; Lukas Rettenbacher; Christian Pirich
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2010-08-11       Impact factor: 9.236

5.  Epirubicin, cyclophosphamide and weekly paclitaxel as neoadjuvant chemotherapy for stage II and III breast cancer.

Authors:  David Aguiar Bujanda; Uriel Bohn Sarmiento; Miguel Angel Cabrera Suárez; Marta Pavcovich Ruiz; Miguel Angel Limeres González; José Aguiar Morales
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-01-25       Impact factor: 4.553

6.  Study of tumour cellularity in locally advanced breast carcinoma on neo-adjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Swarup Kumar; Bhawana Ashok Badhe; K M Krishnan; Haritha Sagili
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2014-04-15

7.  [18F]FDG-PET predicts complete pathological response of breast cancer to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Alina Berriolo-Riedinger; Claude Touzery; Jean-Marc Riedinger; Michel Toubeau; Bruno Coudert; Laurent Arnould; Christophe Boichot; Alexandre Cochet; Pierre Fumoleau; François Brunotte
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2007-06-20       Impact factor: 9.236

8.  [Morphological response to therapy of breast carcinoma].

Authors:  F Länger; H-J Lück; H H Kreipe
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 1.011

9.  Impact of grade, hormone receptor, and HER-2 status in women with breast cancer on response to specific chemotherapeutic agents by in vitro adenosine triphosphate-based chemotherapy response assay.

Authors:  Ja Seung Koo; Woohee Jung; Eunah Shin; Hy-de Lee; Joon Jeong; Kun-Hong Kim; Hyeongjae Jeong; Soon Won Hong
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2009-11-09       Impact factor: 2.153

10.  Assessment of residual tumour by FDG-PET: conventional imaging and clinical examination following primary chemotherapy of large and locally advanced breast cancer.

Authors:  J Dose-Schwarz; R Tiling; S Avril-Sassen; S Mahner; A Lebeau; C Weber; M Schwaiger; F Jänicke; M Untch; N Avril
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-11-17       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.