Literature DB >> 9554861

A national survey of physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia in the United States.

D E Meier1, C A Emmons, S Wallenstein, T Quill, R S Morrison, C K Cassel.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although there have been many studies of physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia in the United States, national data are lacking.
METHODS: In 1996, we mailed questionnaires to a stratified probability sample of 3102 physicians in the 10 specialties in which doctors are most likely to receive requests from patients for assistance with suicide or euthanasia. We weighted the results to obtain nationally representative data.
RESULTS: We received 1902 completed questionnaires (response rate, 61 percent). Eleven percent of the physicians said that under current legal constraints, there were circumstances in which they would be willing to hasten a patient's death by prescribing medication, and 7 percent said that they would provide a lethal injection; 36 percent and 24 percent, respectively, said that they would do so if it were legal. Since entering practice, 18.3 percent of the physicians (unweighted number, 320) reported having received a request from a patient for assistance with suicide and 11.1 percent (unweighted number, 196) had received a request for a lethal injection. Sixteen percent of the physicians receiving such requests (unweighted number, 42), or 3.3 percent of the entire sample, reported that they had written at least one prescription to be used to hasten death, and 4.7 percent (unweighted number, 59), said that they had administered at least one lethal injection.
CONCLUSIONS: A substantial proportion of physicians in the United States report that they receive requests for physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia, and about 7 percent of those who responded to our survey have complied with such requests at least once.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Death and Euthanasia; Empirical Approach

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9554861     DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199804233381706

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  63 in total

1.  Recent advances. Medical ethics.

Authors:  P A Singer
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-07-29

2.  The view of religions toward euthanasia and extraordinary treatments in Japan.

Authors:  N Tanida
Journal:  J Relig Health       Date:  2000

3.  A protocol for consultation of another physician in cases of euthanasia and assisted suicide.

Authors:  B D Onwuteaka-Philipsen; G van der Wal
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 2.903

4.  Views of United States physicians and members of the American Medical Association House of Delegates on physician-assisted suicide.

Authors:  S N Whitney; B W Brown; H Brody; K H Alcser; J G Bachman; H T Greely
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Euthanasia: above ground, below ground.

Authors:  R S Magnusson
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 2.903

6.  Prevalence of formal accusations of murder and euthanasia against physicians.

Authors:  Nathan E Goldstein; Lewis M Cohen; Robert M Arnold; Elizabeth Goy; Stephen Arons; Linda Ganzini
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.947

Review 7.  [Sedation in palliative medicine: Guidelines for the use of sedation in palliative care : European Association for Palliative Care (EAPC)].

Authors:  B Alt-Epping; T Sitte; F Nauck; L Radbruch
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 1.107

8.  Should physicians be open to euthanasia?: NO.

Authors:  Hubert Marcoux
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.275

9.  Impact of treatment for depression on desire for hastened death in patients with advanced AIDS.

Authors:  William Breitbart; Barry Rosenfeld; Christopher Gibson; Michael Kramer; Yuelin Li; Alexis Tomarken; Christian Nelson; Hayley Pessin; Julie Esch; Michele Galietta; Nerina Garcia; John Brechtl; Michael Schuster
Journal:  Psychosomatics       Date:  2010 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.386

10.  Neonatal euthanasia is unsupportable: the Groningen protocol should be abandoned.

Authors:  Alexander A Kon
Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth       Date:  2007
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.