S R Berry1, P A Singer. 1. University of Toronto Joint Centre for Bioethics, and Department of Medical Oncology, Toronto-Sunnybrook Regional Cancer Centre, Ontario, Canada.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Advance directives are an important part of end of life care, but current advance directive documents do not address the specific issues facing cancer patients. The authors' purpose was: 1) to develop a cancer specific advance directive, 2) determine whether oncology outpatients find this directive more acceptable than a generic advance directive, and 3) describe oncology outpatient preferences for life-sustaining treatment. METHODS: A cancer specific advance directive ("The Cancer Living Will"; the full text of the updated version is available at the University of Toronto Joint Centre for Bioethics website [URL: www.utoronto.ca/jcb]) was developed in four steps: 1) literature search, 2) key informant interviews, 3) focus groups, and 4) evaluation of face and content validity. Subsequently, 91 volunteer oncology patients were given copies of the cancer specific advance directive and the generic advance directive ("The University of Toronto Centre for Bioethics Living Will") from which it was adapted. Acceptability of the advance directive was measured by determining the participants' preferred directive. Participants recorded their treatment preferences in both the cancer specific and generic advance directives. RESULTS: Of 60 patients who returned their questionnaires, 50 expressed a preference for the advance directive. Thirty-two patients (64%; 95% confidence interval (CI), 49-77%) preferred the disease specific Cancer Living Will and 18 patients (36%; 95% CI, 23-51%) preferred the generic Centre for Bioethics Living Will. Most participants who preferred the Cancer Living Will did so because it was more specific and relevant to their situation. CONCLUSIONS: The authors have developed and evaluated a cancer specific advance directive that they believe can be recommended for clinical use with cancer patients.
BACKGROUND: Advance directives are an important part of end of life care, but current advance directive documents do not address the specific issues facing cancerpatients. The authors' purpose was: 1) to develop a cancer specific advance directive, 2) determine whether oncology outpatients find this directive more acceptable than a generic advance directive, and 3) describe oncology outpatient preferences for life-sustaining treatment. METHODS: A cancer specific advance directive ("The Cancer Living Will"; the full text of the updated version is available at the University of Toronto Joint Centre for Bioethics website [URL: www.utoronto.ca/jcb]) was developed in four steps: 1) literature search, 2) key informant interviews, 3) focus groups, and 4) evaluation of face and content validity. Subsequently, 91 volunteer oncology patients were given copies of the cancer specific advance directive and the generic advance directive ("The University of Toronto Centre for Bioethics Living Will") from which it was adapted. Acceptability of the advance directive was measured by determining the participants' preferred directive. Participants recorded their treatment preferences in both the cancer specific and generic advance directives. RESULTS: Of 60 patients who returned their questionnaires, 50 expressed a preference for the advance directive. Thirty-two patients (64%; 95% confidence interval (CI), 49-77%) preferred the disease specific Cancer Living Will and 18 patients (36%; 95% CI, 23-51%) preferred the generic Centre for Bioethics Living Will. Most participants who preferred the Cancer Living Will did so because it was more specific and relevant to their situation. CONCLUSIONS: The authors have developed and evaluated a cancer specific advance directive that they believe can be recommended for clinical use with cancerpatients.
Authors: Molly A Feely; Daniel Hildebrandt; Jithinraj Edakkanambeth Varayil; Paul S Mueller Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2016-11-17 Impact factor: 8.237
Authors: Natasha Michael; Clare O'Callaghan; Josephine Clayton; Annabel Pollard; Nikola Stepanov; Odette Spruyt; Michael Michael; David Ball Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2013-03-14 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Caroline Moeller Arnfeldt; Mogens Groenvold; Anna Thit Johnsen; Branka Červ; Luc Deliens; Lesley Dunleavy; Agnes van der Heide; Marijke C Kars; Urška Lunder; Guido Miccinesi; Kristian Pollock; Judith A C Rietjens; Jane Seymour Journal: PLoS One Date: 2022-07-28 Impact factor: 3.752
Authors: Keith C Bible; Electron Kebebew; James Brierley; Juan P Brito; Maria E Cabanillas; Thomas J Clark; Antonio Di Cristofano; Robert Foote; Thomas Giordano; Jan Kasperbauer; Kate Newbold; Yuri E Nikiforov; Gregory Randolph; M Sara Rosenthal; Anna M Sawka; Manisha Shah; Ashok Shaha; Robert Smallridge; Carol K Wong-Clark Journal: Thyroid Date: 2021-03 Impact factor: 6.568