PURPOSE: Because angiomyolipoma is less common in children than in adults, its diagnosis can be difficult. We present 3 cases of pediatric angiomyolipoma in which diagnostic problems resulted due to the presenting characteristics. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We report on 3 children with unilateral renal angiomyolipoma. Computerized tomography (CT) and ultrasonography revealed 3 large renal masses, 20, 7 and 8 cm. in diameter, respectively. A correct diagnosis was not made preoperatively in any case by CT, ultrasound or fine needle biopsy. Wilms tumor was suspected in the first patient who received preoperative chemotherapy. Imaging was inconclusive in the other 2 cases. RESULTS: All patients underwent surgical exploration and subsequent nephrectomy due to the large size of the tumor. At followup 33, 23 and 13 months postoperatively all children were well without signs of recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: It has been reported that the demonstration of fat on renal ultrasound and CT can diagnose angiomyolipoma in 95% of the cases. Most radiologists rely solely on CT demonstration of lipid density in the renal mass to diagnose angiomyolipoma but the identification at imaging of lipid tissue may be difficult in small tumors. In our cases the fat content of the tumors was less than 10% despite the large size. This low fat content results in misdiagnosis, since fatty tissue is also present in other renal tumors, such as lipoma, liposarcoma, teratoma and Wilms tumors. We recommend conservative surgery when tumor size permits in pediatric patients with angiomyolipoma to avoid chemotherapy.
PURPOSE: Because angiomyolipoma is less common in children than in adults, its diagnosis can be difficult. We present 3 cases of pediatric angiomyolipoma in which diagnostic problems resulted due to the presenting characteristics. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We report on 3 children with unilateral renal angiomyolipoma. Computerized tomography (CT) and ultrasonography revealed 3 large renal masses, 20, 7 and 8 cm. in diameter, respectively. A correct diagnosis was not made preoperatively in any case by CT, ultrasound or fine needle biopsy. Wilms tumor was suspected in the first patient who received preoperative chemotherapy. Imaging was inconclusive in the other 2 cases. RESULTS: All patients underwent surgical exploration and subsequent nephrectomy due to the large size of the tumor. At followup 33, 23 and 13 months postoperatively all children were well without signs of recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: It has been reported that the demonstration of fat on renal ultrasound and CT can diagnose angiomyolipoma in 95% of the cases. Most radiologists rely solely on CT demonstration of lipid density in the renal mass to diagnose angiomyolipoma but the identification at imaging of lipid tissue may be difficult in small tumors. In our cases the fat content of the tumors was less than 10% despite the large size. This low fat content results in misdiagnosis, since fatty tissue is also present in other renal tumors, such as lipoma, liposarcoma, teratoma and Wilms tumors. We recommend conservative surgery when tumor size permits in pediatric patients with angiomyolipoma to avoid chemotherapy.