Literature DB >> 9554022

Long-term follow up in lumbar spinal stenosis.

M Scholz1, R Firsching, W R Lanksch.   

Abstract

In a retrospective study the charts of 72 patients who had decompressive surgery for lumbar stenosis between 1987 and 1990 were evaluated. Mean first follow up was 2.5 years (range 1.5 years to 3.5 years). A second follow up was done 8 years after surgery via mail. The mean age was 59.7 years (females 63.7, males 55 years). The average interval between the onset of complaints to surgery was 6 years. Claudicatio intermittens was found in 34.7% of cases. Patients were divided into four groups according to the classification by Arnoldi from 1976. Laminectomy of hemilaminectomy was performed in 73.6% of cases. In 68.1% nucleotomy was performed. In the first follow up outcome of patients was good in 73.6%. Complete recovery was noted in 61.1%. 11% were not satisfied with operative results. Old patients especially benefitted from the operation. In the second follow up after 8 years only 62.1% of the patients mentioned that their results were unchanged, good or better than at the first evaluation. The other 37.9% complained of a poorer result.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9554022     DOI: 10.1038/sj.sc.3100567

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spinal Cord        ISSN: 1362-4393            Impact factor:   2.772


  9 in total

1.  Long-term outcome of decompressive surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis in octogenarians.

Authors:  Shay Shabat; Zeev Arinzon; Yoram Folman; Josef Leitner; Rami David; Evgeny Pevzner; Reuven Gepstein; Ilya Pekarsky; Ishay Shuval
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-10-17       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  The analysis of the factors affecting lumbar spinal stenosis in adult patients.

Authors:  H Kaptan; M Ilhan; K Cakiroglu; O Kasimcan; C Kilic
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2010-02-17       Impact factor: 1.568

3.  Five-year outcome of surgical decompression of the lumbar spine without fusion.

Authors:  Anne F Mannion; R Denzler; J Dvorak; D Grob
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-07-31       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  The outcome of spinal decompression surgery 5 years on.

Authors:  N K Anjarwalla; L C Brown; A H McGregor
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-05-23       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Variation in outcomes across centers after surgery for lumbar stenosis and degenerative spondylolisthesis in the spine patient outcomes research trial.

Authors:  Atman Desai; Kimon Bekelis; Perry A Ball; Jon Lurie; Sohail K Mirza; Tor D Tosteson; Wenyan Zhao; James N Weinstein
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2013-04-15       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Central decompressive laminoplasty for treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis : technique and early surgical results.

Authors:  Young-Joon Kwon
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2014-09-30

7.  Application of lamina replantation with ARCH plate fixation in thoracic and lumbar intraspinal tumors.

Authors:  Dong Zhou; Lu-Ming Nong; Gong-Min Gao; Yu-Qin Jiang; Nan-Wei Xu
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2013-06-20       Impact factor: 2.447

8.  Biomechanical effects of a unilateral approach to minimally invasive lumbar decompression.

Authors:  Zachary A Smith; Georgios A Vastardis; Gerard Carandang; Robert M Havey; Sean Hannon; Nader Dahdaleh; Leonard I Voronov; Richard G Fessler; Avinash G Patwardhan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-21       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Long-term Clinical and Radiological Outcomes after Central Decompressive Laminoplasty for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.

Authors:  Jun-Hwan Kim; Young-Joon Kwon
Journal:  Korean J Spine       Date:  2017-09-30
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.