Literature DB >> 9553563

Pathogenesis of bone loss after total hip arthroplasty.

H E Rubash1, R K Sinha, A S Shanbhag, S Y Kim.   

Abstract

Bone loss with or without evidence of aseptic loosening is a long term complication after total hip arthroplasty (THA). It occurs with all materials and in all prosthetic systems in use or that have been used to date. Bone loss after THA can be a serious problem in revision surgery because bone deficiencies may limit reconstructive options, increase the difficulty of surgery, and necessitate autogenous or allogenic bone grafting. There are three factors adversely affecting maintenance of bone mass after THA: (1) bone loss secondary to particulate debris; (2) adaptive bone remodeling and stress shielding secondary to size, material properties, and surface characteristics of contemporary prostheses; and (3) bone loss as a consequence of natural aging. This chapter reviews the mechanisms of the primary causes of bone loss after THA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9553563     DOI: 10.1016/s0030-5898(05)70316-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am        ISSN: 0030-5898            Impact factor:   2.472


  20 in total

1.  Expression of epidermal growth factor and transforming growth factor alpha in interfacial membranes retrieved at revision total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  J W Xu; J Ma; T F Li; E Waris; A Alberty; S Santavirta; Y T Konttinen
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 19.103

2.  [Periprosthetic bone loss after total hip endoprosthesis. Dependence on the type of prosthesis and preoperative bone configuration].

Authors:  A Roth; G Richartz; K Sander; A Sachse; R Fuhrmann; A Wagner; R-A Venbrocks
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 3.  [Wear particles: key to aseptic prosthetic loosening?].

Authors:  M Otto; J Kriegsmann; T Gehrke; S Bertz
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 1.011

4.  Applications of finite element simulation in orthopedic and trauma surgery.

Authors:  Antonio Herrera; Elena Ibarz; José Cegoñino; Antonio Lobo-Escolar; Sergio Puértolas; Enrique López; Jesús Mateo; Luis Gracia
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2012-04-18

5.  Influence of stem design on the primary stability of megaprostheses of the proximal femur.

Authors:  Stefan Kinkel; Jan Dennis Graage; Jan Philippe Kretzer; Eike Jakubowitz; Jan Nadorf
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-08-18       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  The combined effect of parathyroid hormone and bone graft on implant fixation.

Authors:  H Daugaard; B Elmengaard; T T Andreassen; J Baas; J E Bechtold; K Soballe
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2011-01

7.  Proximal femoral replacement in the management of acute periprosthetic fractures of the hip: a competing risks survival analysis.

Authors:  Matthew Colman; Lisa Choi; Antonia Chen; Lawrence Crossett; Ivan Tarkin; Richard McGough
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2013-07-12       Impact factor: 4.757

8.  Vaginal degeneration following implantation of synthetic mesh with increased stiffness.

Authors:  R Liang; S Abramowitch; K Knight; S Palcsey; A Nolfi; A Feola; S Stein; P A Moalli
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 6.531

Review 9.  Femoral osteolysis following total hip replacement.

Authors:  R Dattani
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 2.401

10.  Minimal stress shielding with a Mallory-Head titanium femoral stem with proximal porous coating in total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Brad Ellison; Nicholas A Cheney; Keith R Berend; Adolph V Lombardi; Thomas H Mallory
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2009-12-09       Impact factor: 2.359

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.