| Literature DB >> 9553533 |
J E Kenzora1, J Magaziner, J Hudson, J R Hebel, Y Young, W Hawkes, G Felsenthal, S I Zimmerman, G Provenzano.
Abstract
A prospective outcome study was performed on 270 patients, 65 years of age and older, who sustained a femoral neck fracture and underwent hemiarthroplasty. The treatment compared was the use of a noncemented unipolar versus either a cemented or a press fit bipolar prosthesis. The outcome variables assessed included the occurrence of a postoperative complication, length and cost of hospitalization, and function in various quality of life measurements. Patients who underwent bipolar hemiarthroplasty with either a cemented or a press fit prosthesis had better pain relief and function than patients who had a noncemented unipolar prosthesis at a minimum of 24 months after surgery. However, the mean hospitalization cost for patients who had a bipolar prosthesis was $12,290 compared with $8876 for a unipolar prosthesis.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 1998 PMID: 9553533
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res ISSN: 0009-921X Impact factor: 4.176