Literature DB >> 9552909

Patients' action during their cardiac event: qualitative study exploring differences and modifiable factors.

A Ruston1, J Clayton, M Calnan.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To explore the circumstances and factors that explain variations in response to a cardiac event and to identify potentially modifiable factors.
DESIGN: Qualitative analysis of semistructured, face to face interviews with patients admitted to two district hospitals for a cardiac event and with other people present at the time of the event. Patients were divided into three groups according to the length of delay between onset of symptoms and calling for medical help.
SUBJECTS: 43 patients and 21 other people present at the time of the cardiac event. Patients were divided into three groups according to the length of time between onset of symptoms and seeking medical help: non-delayers (< 4 h; n = 21), delayers (4-12 h; n = 12), and extended delayers (> 12 h; n = 10). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Decision making process, strategies for dealing with symptoms, and perception of risk and of heart attacks before the event according to delay in seeking help.
RESULTS: The illness and help seeking behaviour of informants had several components, including warning, interpretation, preliminary action, re-evaluation, and final action stages. The length of each stage was variable and depended on the extent to which informants mobilised and integrated resources into a strategy to bring their symptoms under control. There were obvious differences in informants' knowledge of the symptoms that they associated with a heart attack before the event. Non-delayers described a wider range of symptoms before their heart attack and twice as many (13) considered themselves to be potentially at risk of a heart attack compared with the other two groups. For most informants the heart attack differed considerably from their concept of a heart attack.
CONCLUSION: The most critical factor influencing the time between onset of symptoms and calling for professional medical help is that patients and others recognise their symptoms as cardiac in origin. This study suggests that various points of intervention in the decision making process could assist symptom recognition and therefore faster access to effective treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9552909      PMCID: PMC28510          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.316.7137.1060

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


  12 in total

1.  Normal rubbish: deviant patients in casualty departments.

Authors:  R Jeffery
Journal:  Sociol Health Illn       Date:  1979-06

2.  Understanding delay in response to symptoms of acute myocardial infarction. A compelling agenda.

Authors:  A T Wielgosz; R P Nolan
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  Qualitative medical sociology: what are its crowning achievements?

Authors:  J A Chard; R J Lilford; B V Court
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 5.344

4.  Qualitative research in health care: II. A structured review and evaluation of studies.

Authors:  M Boulton; R Fitzpatrick; C Swinburn
Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 2.431

5.  Factors contributing to delay in responding to the signs and symptoms of acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  T P Hackett; N H Cassem
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1969-11       Impact factor: 2.778

Review 6.  Rigour and qualitative research.

Authors:  N Mays; C Pope
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-07-08

7.  The prehospital phase of acute myocardial infarction in the era of thrombolysis.

Authors:  S B Schmidt; M A Borsch
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1990-06-15       Impact factor: 2.778

Review 8.  Acute myocardial infarction: pre-hospital and in-hospital management. The Task Force on the Management of Acute Myocardial Infarction of the European Society of Cardiology.

Authors: 
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 29.983

9.  Guidelines for the early management of patients with myocardial infarction. British Heart Foundation Working Group.

Authors:  C F Weston; W J Penny; D G Julian
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-03-19

10.  Delay in presentation after myocardial infarction.

Authors:  A G Heriot; S J Brecker; D J Coltart
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 18.000

View more
  25 in total

1.  Influence on general practitioners of teaching undergraduates: qualitative study of London general practitioner teachers.

Authors:  S Hartley; F Macfarlane; M Gantley; E Murray
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-10-30

2.  Tackling coronary heart disease.

Authors:  A White; L Lockyer
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-11-03

3.  Complexity, leadership, and management in healthcare organisations.

Authors:  P E Plsek; T Wilson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-09-29

4.  Questions for general practice.

Authors:  Alistair Howitt
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-05-24

5.  Psychosocial effects of the 2001 UK foot and mouth disease epidemic in a rural population: qualitative diary based study.

Authors:  Maggie Mort; Ian Convery; Josephine Baxter; Cathy Bailey
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-10-07

6.  Pain is not the only feature of heart attack.

Authors:  T Treasure
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-08-29

7.  Effects of ambulance response times are being evaluated.

Authors:  J Nicholl; J Willoughby
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-09-05

8.  Deaths outside hospital from acute coronary events . Early access to defibrillation is a key to survival

Authors: 
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-09-19

9.  Cardiac arrests outside hospital.

Authors:  T Evans
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-04-04

Review 10.  Early identification and delay to treatment in myocardial infarction and stroke: differences and similarities.

Authors:  Johan Herlitz; Birgitta Wireklintsundström; Angela Bång; Annika Berglund; Leif Svensson; Christian Blomstrand
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2010-09-06       Impact factor: 2.953

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.