Literature DB >> 9552520

Cost effectiveness of stent implantation versus PTCA: the BENESTENT experience.

B A Van Hout1, T van der Woude, P P de Jaegere, M van den Brand, G A van Es, P W Serruys, M A Morel.   

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to assess the costs and effects of stent implantation versus percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA). Data have been taken from both the BENESTENT-I and BENESTENT-II pilot study. Effects are expressed in terms of event-free survival and costs include those of the initial hospitalization and those during follow-up. The costs per additional event-free survivor after 7 months are estimated at Dfl 88,315, Dfl 28,127 and Dfl 6747 using respectively the results from the BENSTENT-I study, the BENESTENT-II pilot study and phase IV of the BENESTENT-II pilot study. Significant decreases in complications and ischaemic events have made stent implantation not only the most favourable in terms of event-free survival but also in terms of cost effectiveness.

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 9552520

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Interv Cardiol        ISSN: 1084-2764


  3 in total

1.  Long term outcome and cost-effectiveness of stenting versus balloon angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  H Suryapranata; J P Ottervanger; E Nibbering; A W van 't Hof; J C Hoorntje; M J de Boer; M J Al; F Zijlstra
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 5.994

2.  Who needs a stent?

Authors:  S W Davies
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 3.  Sirolimus-eluting coronary stents: a review.

Authors:  Alexandre Abizaid
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2007
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.