Literature DB >> 9552104

Predictors of health status and life satisfaction in spinal cord injury.

M W Post1, L P de Witte, F W van Asbeck, A J van Dijk, A J Schrijvers.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To analyze relationships between injury-related variables, demographic variables, functional health status, and life satisfaction of people with spinal cord injury (SCI).
DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey.
SETTING: A community in the Netherlands.
SUBJECTS: Three hundred eighteen people with SCI, aged 18 to 65 years. Mean age was 39.4 years and mean time after injury was 3.6 years. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Health status was measured with the SIP68. Its six scales were aggregated to three dimensions, measuring physical, psychologic, and social functioning. Life satisfaction was measured with the Life Satisfaction Questionnaire. Data were analyzed by path analysis using LISREL V8.
RESULTS: Obtained scores showed that respondents suffered from serious limitations in physical functioning and social functioning, had only a few limitations in psychologic functioning, and were satisfied with their lives in general and with most life domains. Physical functioning was accurately predicted by injury-related variables, but psychologic functioning was not. Next to level and completeness of the injury, the number of secondary complications turned out to be a predictor of functional health. In a path model that had a close fit with the data, injury-related variables were related to health status but not to life satisfaction. Social functioning (-.48), marital status (-.38), psychologic functioning (-.19), and age (-.16) were significant predictors of life satisfaction (total R2=.44).
CONCLUSIONS: This study points out the high prevalence of secondary complications and their importance to the health status of people with SCI. Level of social and psychologic functioning are more important predictors of life satisfaction than the seriousness of the injury.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9552104     DOI: 10.1016/s0003-9993(98)90139-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil        ISSN: 0003-9993            Impact factor:   3.966


  33 in total

1.  Professional standards of practice for psychologists, social workers, and counselors in SCI rehabilitation.

Authors:  Heather F Russell; Elizabeth J Richardson; Charles H Bombardier; Thomas M Dixon; Toby A Huston; Jon Rose; Dawn Sheaffer; Shaun A Smith; Philip M Ullrich
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2015-12-28       Impact factor: 1.985

2.  Assessment of quality of life in relation to spasticity severity and socio-demographic and clinical factors among patients with spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Meltem Vural; Ebru Yilmaz Yalcinkaya; Evrim Coskun Celik; Berrin Gunduz; Ahmet Bozan; Belgin Erhan
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 1.985

3.  Stability of transition to adulthood among individuals with pediatric-onset spinal cord injuries.

Authors:  Caroline J Anderson; Lawrence C Vogel; Kathleen M Willis; Randal R Betz
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 1.985

4.  Assessment of physical function and secondary complications after complete spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Shauna Dudley-Javoroski; Richard K Shields
Journal:  Disabil Rehabil       Date:  2006-01-30       Impact factor: 3.033

5.  Changes in pain and quality of life in depressed individuals with spinal cord injury: does type of pain matter?

Authors:  Elizabeth J Richardson; Larry G Brooks; J Scott Richards; Charles H Bombardier; Jason Barber; Denise Tate; Martin B Forchheimer; Jesse R Fann
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2016-03-04       Impact factor: 1.985

6.  Intact responses to non-drug rewards in long-term opioid maintenance treatment.

Authors:  Marie Eikemo; Philipp P Lobmaier; Mads L Pedersen; Nikolaj Kunøe; Anna Maria Matziorinis; Siri Leknes; Monica Sarfi
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2019-03-31       Impact factor: 7.853

7.  Secondary health conditions and disability among people with spinal cord injury: A prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Amy Richardson; Ari Samaranayaka; Martin Sullivan; Sarah Derrett
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2019-03-18       Impact factor: 1.985

8.  Identifying and classifying quality of life tools for assessing spasticity after spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Christina Balioussis; Sander L Hitzig; Heather Flett; Luc Noreau; B Catharine Craven
Journal:  Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil       Date:  2014

9.  Are persons with physical disabilities who participate in society healthier and happier? Structural equation modelling of objective participation and subjective well-being.

Authors:  Cretien van Campen; Jurjen Iedema
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2007-02-01       Impact factor: 4.147

10.  Household income and subjective well-being after spinal cord injury: a longitudinal study.

Authors:  Yue Cao; James S Krause; Lee L Saunders; William Bingham
Journal:  Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil       Date:  2014
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.