Literature DB >> 9552091

Treatment strategies for atrial fibrillation.

F Jung1, J P DiMarco.   

Abstract

Atrial fibrillation is the most common arrhythmia observed in clinical practice, occurring in 0.4% of the general population and in up to 4% of people greater than 60 years old. It is often associated with other cardiovascular disorders, such as hypertension, coronary artery disease, or cardiomyopathy. Critical evaluation and management of patients with atrial fibrillation requires knowledge of etiology, prognosis, and treatment options of this arrhythmia. On initial presentation, emergency electrical cardioversion should be performed if the patient is hemodynamically unstable. If the patient is stable, initial rate control is recommended, using atrioventricular nodal blocking agents. Further treatment mainly depends upon the duration of the episode. Patients who are in atrial fibrillation <48 hours can be safely cardioverted. Patients who are in atrial fibrillation for >48 hours are commonly anticoagulated for 3 to 4 weeks before and after cardioversion because of the risk of thromboembolism formation in the left atrial appendage. An alternate strategy, which is especially attractive when immediate cardioversion is desired, is transesophageal echocardiography to exclude left atrial thrombus followed by prompt cardioversion. After cardioversion, sinus rhythm can be maintained with class I and III drugs, such as flecainide and propafenone or amiodarone and sotalol. New treatment options, such as atrial defibrillation, atrioventricular junctional ablation, or modification of atrial pacing to prevent atrial fibrillation, are currently under investigation. Although atrial fibrillation is so common in clinical practice, it still remains difficult to treat. Conversion and maintenance to sinus rhythm with antiarrhythmic drug therapy has not shown any improvement in mortality, and some patients may benefit more from ventricular rate control. This review article discusses different treatment strategies for patients with atrial fibrillation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9552091     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9343(97)00346-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med        ISSN: 0002-9343            Impact factor:   4.965


  7 in total

Review 1.  Mechanisms of antiarrhythmic drug actions and their clinical relevance for controlling disorders of cardiac rhythm.

Authors:  Uma Srivatsa; Nitin Wadhani; Bramah N Singh
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.931

2.  Frequency-dependent electrophysiological effect of ibutilide on human atrium and ventricle.

Authors:  N Oshikawa; I Watanabe; R Masaki; A Shindo; T Kojima; S Saito; Y Ozawa; K Kanmatsuse
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 3.  Emergency management of atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  A Wakai; J O O'Neill
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 2.401

Review 4.  Cost effectiveness of therapies for atrial fibrillation. A review.

Authors:  M P Teng; L E Catherwood; D P Melby
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 4.981

5.  Remodeling of the left atrium in pacing-induced atrial cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Brian D Hoit; Yasuchika Takeishi; Michael J Cox; Marorie Gabel; Darryl Kirkpatrick; Richard A Walsh; Suresh C Tyagi
Journal:  Mol Cell Biochem       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 3.396

6.  Risk of mortality in a cohort of patients newly diagnosed with chronic atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Ana Ruigómez; Saga Johansson; Mari-Ann Wallander; Luis Alberto García Rodríguez
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2002-02-26       Impact factor: 2.298

7.  Intravenous Amiodarone versus Digoxin in Atrial Fibrillation Rate Control; a Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Majid Shojaee; Bahareh Feizi; Reza Miri; Jalil Etemadi; Amir Hossein Feizi
Journal:  Emerg (Tehran)       Date:  2017-01-10
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.