Literature DB >> 9551004

Variation between studies in reported relative risks associated with hypertension: time trends and other explanatory variables.

P J Marang-van de Mheen1, L J Gunning-Schepers.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study examined the variation in reported relative risks of coronary heart disease and stroke associated with hypertension and determined reasons for the interstudy variation.
METHODS: Studies published since 1970 were examined that reported the absolute number of events and person-years for men by age and hypertensive status. The data were pooled in Poisson regression models with the coronary heart disease or stroke rate as the dependent variable. Independent variables were hypertensive status, age at entry, age of study, duration of follow-up, diastolic blood pressure cut-off point, and interactions of all these variables with hypertensive status.
RESULTS: The reported relative risks associated with hypertension ranged from 1.45 to 2.77 for coronary heart disease and from 1.86 to 5.78 for stroke. Smaller relative risks were found in more recent studies, in studies with long follow-up, and in studies using a lower cut-off point to define hypertension.
CONCLUSIONS: Part of the interstudy variation in relative risks associated with hypertension can be attributed to differences in duration of follow-up, blood pressure cutoff point, and time at which blood pressure was measured, suggesting declining relative risks over time.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9551004      PMCID: PMC1508417          DOI: 10.2105/ajph.88.4.618

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  22 in total

1.  Hypertension and risk of stroke in an elderly population.

Authors:  R B Shekelle; A M Ostfeld; H L Klawans
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1974 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 7.914

2.  Coronary heart disease in Western Collaborative Group Study. Final follow-up experience of 8 1/2 years.

Authors:  R H Rosenman; R J Brand; D Jenkins; M Friedman; R Straus; M Wurm
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1975-08-25       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  The changing pattern of hypertension and the declining incidence of stroke.

Authors:  W M Garraway; J P Whisnant
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1987-07-10       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Enhanced risk of coronary heart disease mortality in lean hypertensive men.

Authors:  U Goldbourt; E Holtzman; L Cohen-Mandelzweig; H N Neufeld
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 10.190

5.  Relation of blood pressure, serum lipids, and smoking to the risk of cerebral stroke. A longitudinal study in Eastern Finland.

Authors:  J T Salonen; P Puska; J Tuomilehto; K Homan
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1982 May-Jun       Impact factor: 7.914

6.  The impact of elevated blood pressure upon 10-year mortality among Japanese men in Hawaii: the Honolulu Heart Program.

Authors:  K Yano; D McGee; D M Reed
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1983

Review 7.  The decline of stroke.

Authors:  J P Whisnant
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1984 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 7.914

8.  Need to prevent and control high-normal and high blood pressure, particularly so-called "mild" hypertension: epidemiological and clinical data.

Authors:  D Giumetti; K Liu; R Stamler; J A Schoenberger; R B Shekelle; J Stamler
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 4.018

9.  Epidemiology and risk of hypertension in the elderly: the Framingham Study.

Authors:  P S Vokonas; W B Kannel; L A Cupples
Journal:  J Hypertens Suppl       Date:  1988-11

10.  Incidence of hypertension in the Framingham Study.

Authors:  A L Dannenberg; R J Garrison; W B Kannel
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 9.308

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Evidence based management of hypertension. Cardiovascular risk factors and their effects on the decision to treat hypertension: evidence based review.

Authors:  R Padwal; S E Straus; F A McAlister
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-04-21

2.  Cardiovascular risk factors and disease in general practice: results of the Nijmegen Cohort Study.

Authors:  J C Bakx; H J M Van den Hoogen; W J H M Van den Bosch; T Thien; C van Weel
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 5.386

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.