Literature DB >> 9550314

Immunohistologic differential diagnosis of basal cell carcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, and trichoepithelioma in small cutaneous biopsy specimens.

P E Swanson1, M M Fitzpatrick, J H Ritter, E J Glusac, M R Wick.   

Abstract

The distinction between squamoid basal cell carcinoma and basaloid squamous cell carcinoma (or between BCC and trichoepithelioma variants) is usually made readily on the basis of defined histological criteria. However, these differential diagnoses occasionally can pose difficult morphological problems. The stated distinctions are clinically important because the risk of progressive disease is significantly higher with squamous carcinoma of the skin than with basal cell carcinoma (BCC), and a trichoepithelioma misinterpreted as BCC burdens the patient with an inaccurate diagnosis that may result in inappropriate surgery. Recent reports have suggested that reactivity with the monoclonal antibody Ber-EP4 is capable of separating histologically similar basal cell and squamous carcinomas, and that the expression of bcl-2 or CD34 antigen is able to distinguish BCC from trichoepithelioma. However, corroborative studies of these contentions are few in number. In order to investigate the usefulness of the stated immunostains in the above-cited differential diagnoses, the authors analyzed 45 basal cell carcinomas and 22 squamous carcinomas, as well as 36 trichoepitheliomas. The monoclonal antibodies Ber-EP4, My10 (CD34), and anti-bcl-2 were applied to formalin-fixed paraffin sections in all cases, using a standard avidin-biotin-peroxidase complex method. Most BCCs demonstrated strong, diffuse cytoplasmic labeling with Ber-EP4 and anti-bcl-2. In contrast, the squamous carcinomas were uniformly negative for the former marker and only focally reactive for the latter in four examples. 'Peripheral' bcl-2 staining of trichoepitheliomas was noted in 24 of 33 of the immunoreactive tumors, but the remainder were marked diffusely and similarly to most BCCs. Among the latter, immature trichoepitheliomas were diffusely reactive for this marker in 6 of 8 cases. Labeling of epithelium for CD34 failed to discriminate between any of the tumor types under evaluation, whereas staining of peritumoral stroma was characteristic of the majority of trichoepitheliomas and more than one-third of metatypical basal cell carcinomas. These data support the suggestion that Ber-EP4 and bcl-2 are useful in the separation of BCC from squamous carcinomas. Nevertheless, they also serve to caution against reliance upon bcl-2 and CD34 immunostains in attempting to distinguish BCC from trichoepithelioma in histologically enigmatic cases. There is currently no certain method other than conventional microscopy that can be applied successfully to the latter problem.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9550314     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0560.1998.tb01708.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cutan Pathol        ISSN: 0303-6987            Impact factor:   1.587


  15 in total

1.  The importance of cytokeratin 19 expression in the differentiation of Basal cell carcinoma and trichoepithelioma.

Authors:  Recep Bedir; Ibrahim Sehitoglu; Cüneyt Yurdakul; Ismail Saygin; Pelin Üstüner; Nursel Dilek
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2015-01-01

2.  CD34+ fibrocytes in tubular carcinomas and radial scars of the breast.

Authors:  Annette Ramaswamy; Roland Moll; Peter J Barth
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2003-07-29       Impact factor: 4.064

3.  Use of Ber-EP4 and Epithelial Specific Antigen to Differentiate Clinical Simulators of Basal Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Bahar Dasgeb; Tarana M Mohammadi; Darius R Mehregan
Journal:  Biomark Cancer       Date:  2013-06-25

4.  CD10 expression helps to differentiate basal cell carcinoma from trichoepithelioma.

Authors:  Mitra Heidarpour; Parvin Rajabi; Farzaneh Sajadi
Journal:  J Res Med Sci       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 1.852

5.  Expression and role of fibroblast activation protein-alpha in microinvasive breast carcinoma.

Authors:  Xing Hua; Lina Yu; Xiaoxiao Huang; Zexiao Liao; Qi Xian
Journal:  Diagn Pathol       Date:  2011-11-08       Impact factor: 2.644

6.  Multiple Familial Trichoepithelioma with an Adjacent Basal Cell Carcinoma, Transformation or Collision - A Case Report and Review of Literature.

Authors:  Ashok Sangwaiya; Jyoti Sharma; Swati Sharma; Anand Munghate; Swagatika Samal; Rajeev Sen
Journal:  Indian J Dermatol       Date:  2015 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.494

7.  Significance of androgen receptor and CD10 expression in cutaneous basal cell carcinoma and trichoepithelioma.

Authors:  Hesna M Astarci; Gulfem A Gurbuz; Demet Sengul; Sema Hucumenoglu; Ugur Kocer; Huseyin Ustun
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2015-10-13       Impact factor: 2.967

Review 8.  The Multiple Faces of Nodular Trichoblastoma: Review of the Literature with Case Presentation.

Authors:  Gerardo Cazzato; Antonietta Cimmino; Anna Colagrande; Francesca Arezzo; Lucia Lospalluti; Sara Sablone; Teresa Lettini; Leonardo Resta; Giuseppe Ingravallo
Journal:  Dermatopathology (Basel)       Date:  2021-07-05

Review 9.  Metatypical basal cell carcinoma: a clinical review.

Authors:  Mauro Tarallo; Emanuele Cigna; Riccardo Frati; Sergio Delfino; Daniele Innocenzi; Umberto Fama; Annamaria Corbianco; Nicolò Scuderi
Journal:  J Exp Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2008-11-07

10.  The rate and pattern of bcl-2 and cytokeratin 15 expression in trichoepithelioma and nodular Basal cell carcinoma: a comparative study.

Authors:  Shahram Sabeti; Farhad Malekzad; Mehrdad Ashayer; Rohollah F Fouladi; Kambiz K Hesari; Mihan P Toutkaboni; Shima Younespour
Journal:  Indian J Dermatol       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 1.494

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.