Literature DB >> 9550201

Fetal macrosomia: risk factors and outcome. A study of the outcome concerning 100 cases >4500 g.

J Bérard1, P Dufour, D Vinatier, D Subtil, S Vanderstichèle, J C Monnier, F Puech.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Because difficult vaginal delivery is more frequent with macrosomic fetuses, some authors recommend routine caesarean section for the delivery of fetuses >4500 g. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the appropriateness of this recommendation, in particular, to analyze maternal and fetal complications according to the mode of delivery.
METHOD: Maternal and neonatal records of 100 infants with weights of at least 4500 g were identified retrospectively from January 1991 to December 1996. Outcome variables included the mode of delivery and the incidence of maternal and perinatal complications.
RESULTS: The study sample consisted of 100 infant and mother pairs. Macrosomic fetuses represented 0.95% of all deliveries during this period and only ten were >5000 g. Mean birth weight was 4730 g (maximum, 5780 g). Gestational diabetes was present in nineteen patients. Diabetes was present in three patients. A trial of labour was allowed in 87 women, and elective caesarean delivery was performed in thirteen patients. The overall cesarean rate, including elective caesarean delivery and failed trial of labour, was 36%. Of those undergoing a trial of labour, 73% (64/87) delivered vaginally. Shoulder dystocia occurred fourteen times (22% of vaginal deliveries) and it was the most frequent complication in our series. There were five cases of Erb's palsy, one of which was associated with humeral fracture, and four cases of clavicular fracture. By three months of age, all affected infants were without sequelae. There was no related perinatal mortality and only two cases of birth asphyxia. Maternal complications with vaginal delivery of macrosomic infants included a high incidence of lacerations requiring repair (eleven cases). No complications were noticed in the patients who had a caesarean section.
CONCLUSION: Vaginal delivery is a reasonable alternative to elective cesarean section for infants with estimated birth weights of less than 5000 g and a trial of labour can be offered. For the fetuses with estimated birth weight >5000 g, an elective caesarean section should be recommended, especially in primiparous women.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9550201     DOI: 10.1016/s0301-2115(97)00242-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol        ISSN: 0301-2115            Impact factor:   2.435


  22 in total

1.  Externalizing behaviors in preadolescents: familial risk to externalizing behaviors, prenatal and perinatal risks, and their interactions.

Authors:  Cathelijne J M Buschgens; Sophie H N Swinkels; Marcel A G van Aken; Johan Ormel; Frank C Verhulst; Jan K Buitelaar
Journal:  Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  2008-06-28       Impact factor: 4.785

2.  Shoulder Dystocia.

Authors:  Shakti Vardhan; S K Basu
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2011-07-21

3.  Being macrosomic at birth is an independent predictor of overweight in children: results from the IDEFICS study.

Authors:  Sonia Sparano; Wolfgang Ahrens; Stefaan De Henauw; Staffan Marild; Denes Molnar; Luis A Moreno; Marc Suling; Michael Tornaritis; Toomas Veidebaum; Alfonso Siani; Paola Russo
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2013-10

4.  Advanced parental age is an independent risk factor for term low birth weight and macrosomia.

Authors:  Yoo Hyun Chung; In Sun Hwang; Gyul Jung; Hyun Sun Ko
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 1.817

5.  Risk Factors for Macrosomia.

Authors:  Elie Nkwabong; Guilherme Roger Nzalli Tangho
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2014-07-05

6.  Fetal and maternal outcomes in pregnancies complicated with fetal macrosomia.

Authors:  Mohamed Alkahatim Alsammani; Salah Roshdy Ahmed
Journal:  N Am J Med Sci       Date:  2012-06

7.  Maternal and neonatal outcomes of macrosomic pregnancies.

Authors:  Alina Weissmann-Brenner; Michal J Simchen; Eran Zilberberg; Anat Kalter; Boaz Weisz; Reuven Achiron; Mordechai Dulitzky
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2012-09

Review 8.  After shoulder dystocia: managing the subsequent pregnancy and delivery.

Authors:  Edith D Gurewitsch; Tara L Johnson; Robert H Allen
Journal:  Semin Perinatol       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.311

9.  Central adiposity and other anthropometric factors in relation to risk of macrosomia in an African American population.

Authors:  Se Li; Lynn Rosenberg; Julie R Palmer; Ghasi S Phillips; Linda J Heffner; Lauren A Wise
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 5.002

Review 10.  Induction of labour at or near term for suspected fetal macrosomia.

Authors:  Michel Boulvain; Olivier Irion; Therese Dowswell; Jim G Thornton
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-05-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.