Literature DB >> 9549924

A randomized trial of high dose polyvalent intravenous immunoglobulin (HDIgG) vs. Cytomegalovirus (CMV) hyperimmune IgG in allogeneic hemopoietic stem cell transplants (HSCT).

P Zikos1, M T Van Lint, T Lamparelli, F Gualandi, D Occhini, N Mordini, G Berisso, S Bregante, A Bacigalupo.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
OBJECTIVE: The role of high dose intravenous IgG (HDIgG) and of hyperimmune CMV IgG (CMV-IgG) in patients undergoing allogeneic hemopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is still unclear. The aim of this study was to compare prophylactic CMV-IgG with HDIgGin a randomized prospective trial in allogeneic HSCT recipients: primary end point of the study was the occurrence of post-transplant CMV antigenemia (CMVAg-emia). Secondary end-points were severity of acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease (GvHD), infections and transplant related mortality (TRM). DESIGN AND METHODS: Patients were randomized to receive 100 mg/kg/week of CMV-IgG (group A; n = 64) or 400 mg/kg/week of HDIgG (group B; n = 64) from day -7 to day +100. The two groups were comparable for age, diagnosis, disease status, and acute graft-versus host (aGvHD) prophylaxis.
RESULTS: The actuarial risk at 1 year of CMV antigenemia was lower for CMV-IgG (61% vs. 71%) but not significantly (p = 0.37); CMVAg-emia occurred at the same interval from HSCT (47 vs. 48 days, p = 0.9), with a comparable number of CMVAg positive cells (3 vs. 3 p = 0.9). Eight patients died of interstitial pneumonia (IP) (4 in each group), two in group A of CMV-IP. Acute GvHD was scored as O-I, II and III-IV in 39 vs. 35, 23 vs. 22 and 2 vs. 7 patients respectively for the two groups (p = not significant). The actuarial risk of developing acute GvHD grade II-IV was lower for CMV-IgG (39% vs. 45%) but not significantly (p = 0.43). Chronic GvHD scored as absent in 7 vs. 10 patients, limited in 39 vs. 37 and extensive in 19 vs. 17 patients respectively (p = not significant). Numbered days with intravenous antibiotics, days in hospital, days of fever, number of local and disseminated infections, number of patients with fever of unknown origin were not significantly different. Actuarial 1 year TRM is 18% vs. 19%, respectively (p = 0.9). INTERPRETATION AND
CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms that CMV antigenemia is comparable in recipients of hyperimmune CMV-IgG and of polyvalent HDIgG, although the former had a 32% lower cost. It also shows that the potential immunomodulating effect on acute GvHD and transplant mortality is similar with 100 or 400 mg of IgG/kg/week: this is relevant, in view of the high cost of prophylactic HDIgG.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9549924

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Haematologica        ISSN: 0390-6078            Impact factor:   9.941


  11 in total

Review 1.  Passive immunity in prevention and treatment of infectious diseases.

Authors:  M A Keller; E R Stiehm
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 26.132

Review 2.  How we treat cytomegalovirus in hematopoietic cell transplant recipients.

Authors:  Michael Boeckh; Per Ljungman
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2009-03-18       Impact factor: 22.113

3.  9 Human Immunoglobulins.

Authors: 
Journal:  Transfus Med Hemother       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 3.747

4.  Cytotect®CP as salvage therapy in patients with CMV infection following allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation: a multicenter retrospective study.

Authors:  Tamim Alsuliman; Caroline Kitel; Rémy Dulery; Thierry Guillaume; Fabrice Larosa; Jérôme Cornillon; Helene Labussière-Wallet; Clémence Médiavilla; Stéphanie Belaiche; Jeremy Delage; Sophie Alain; Ibrahim Yakoub-Agha
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2018-04-13       Impact factor: 5.483

5.  Cytomegalovirus in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients.

Authors:  Per Ljungman; Morgan Hakki; Michael Boeckh
Journal:  Hematol Oncol Clin North Am       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.722

6.  Cytomegalovirus Humoral Response Against Epithelial Cell Entry-Mediated Infection in the Primary Infection Setting After Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation.

Authors:  Danniel Zamora; Elizabeth M Krantz; Margaret L Green; Laurel Joncas-Schronce; Rachel Blazevic; Bradley C Edmison; Meei-Li Huang; Terry Stevens-Ayers; Keith R Jerome; Adam P Geballe; Michael Boeckh
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2020-04-07       Impact factor: 5.226

Review 7.  Evidence for the use of intravenous immunoglobulins--a review of the literature.

Authors:  Shaye Kivity; Uriel Katz; Natalie Daniel; Udi Nussinovitch; Neophytos Papageorgiou; Yehuda Shoenfeld
Journal:  Clin Rev Allergy Immunol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 8.667

Review 8.  Moving Past Ganciclovir and Foscarnet: Advances in CMV Therapy.

Authors:  Morgan Hakki
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 4.213

9.  Infectious diseases in allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation: prevention and prophylaxis strategy guidelines 2016.

Authors:  Andrew J Ullmann; Martin Schmidt-Hieber; Hartmut Bertz; Werner J Heinz; Michael Kiehl; William Krüger; Sabine Mousset; Stefan Neuburger; Silke Neumann; Olaf Penack; Gerda Silling; Jörg Janne Vehreschild; Hermann Einsele; Georg Maschmeyer
Journal:  Ann Hematol       Date:  2016-06-24       Impact factor: 3.673

Review 10.  Exploring the native human antibody repertoire to create antiviral therapeutics.

Authors:  S K Dessain; S P Adekar; J D Berry
Journal:  Curr Top Microbiol Immunol       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 4.291

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.