Literature DB >> 9549010

The relationship between journal use in a medical library and citation use.

M Y Tsay1.   

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to investigate the relationship between library journal use and journal citation use in the medical sciences. The six-month journal use study was conducted in the Library of the Veterans General Hospital in Taipei. The data on citation frequency and impact factors were obtained from Journal Citation Reports, 1993 microfiche edition. The study explored the use, citation, and impact factor data, especially for heavily used, highly cited, or high-impact-factor journals. The correlations between frequency of use and citation frequency and between frequency of use and impact factor were determined by using the Spearman rank and Pearson correlation tests. The same comparisons were also made within four subject categories: clinical medicine journals, life science journals, hybrid journals publishing both clinical medicine and life science papers, and journals that publish neither clinical medicine nor life science articles. The results of the study showed that there is a significant correlation between frequency of use and citation frequency, and between frequency of use and impact factor for all titles. There is also a significant correlation between frequency of use and citation frequency and between frequency of use and impact factor for journals that publish either clinical medicine or life science articles, or both. However, the correlation is not significant for other journals.

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9549010      PMCID: PMC226323     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bull Med Libr Assoc        ISSN: 0025-7338


  3 in total

1.  Impact factor as a misleading tool in evaluation of medical journals.

Authors:  S Hansson
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1995-09-30       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Journal impact factors.

Authors:  N B Metcalfe
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1995-08-31       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Linear vs. pluridirectional tomography of the chest: correlative radiographic anatomic study.

Authors:  J T Littleton; M L Durizch; W P Callahan
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1980-02       Impact factor: 3.959

  3 in total
  9 in total

1.  Reading factor: a new bibliometric criterion for managing digital libraries.

Authors:  Stefan J Darmoni; Francis Roussel; Jacques Benichou; Benoit Thirion; Nicole Pinhas
Journal:  J Med Libr Assoc       Date:  2002-07

2.  Journal-citation-seeking behavior at two health sciences libraries.

Authors:  Sunny Lynn Worel
Journal:  J Med Libr Assoc       Date:  2004-01

3.  Impact factor: a valid measure of journal quality?

Authors:  Somnath Saha; Sanjay Saint; Dimitri A Christakis
Journal:  J Med Libr Assoc       Date:  2003-01

4.  Quality markers and use of electronic journals in an academic health sciences library.

Authors:  Judith L Wulff; Neal D Nixon
Journal:  J Med Libr Assoc       Date:  2004-07

5.  Continuing use of print-only information by researchers.

Authors:  Steven A Knowlton
Journal:  J Med Libr Assoc       Date:  2007-01

6.  Citation analysis of Minnesota Department of Health official publications and journal articles: a needs assessment for the RN Barr Library.

Authors:  Melissa L Rethlefsen
Journal:  J Med Libr Assoc       Date:  2007-07

7.  The long tail: a usage analysis of pre-1993 print biomedical journal literature.

Authors:  Susan Starr; Jeff Williams
Journal:  J Med Libr Assoc       Date:  2008-01

8.  Measurements of journal use: an analysis of the correlations between three methods.

Authors:  D D Blecic
Journal:  Bull Med Libr Assoc       Date:  1999-01

9.  Current Issues on Research Conducted to Improve Women's Health.

Authors:  Charalampos Siristatidis; Vasilios Karageorgiou; Paraskevi Vogiatzi
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-17
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.