Literature DB >> 9548524

Surgical management of sagittal synostosis: a comparative analysis of strip craniectomy and calvarial vault remodeling.

T A Maugans1, J G McComb, M L Levy.   

Abstract

Although surgical treatment of sagittal synostosis has become normative, the procedure of choice is still debated. This retrospective analysis, during a 10-year period (1986-1995) at Children's Hospital Los Angeles, compares the more conservative strip craniectomy (SC) procedure with a more extensive occipital reduction-biparietal widening calvarial vault remodeling (CVR) technique for the management of sagittal synostosis. SC was performed in 72 patients (61%) and CVR in 46 (39%). Patients undergoing CVR were older (mean 5.3 vs. 3.0 months, p < 0.01), the procedure time longer (mean 126 min vs. 72 min, p < 0.01), intraoperative blood loss greater (mean 243 vs. 54 cm3, p < 0.01), and the frequency of intraoperative blood transfusion increased (100 vs. 38%, p < 0.01; mean volume 357 vs. 51 cm3, p < 0.01) compared to patients undergoing SC. No significant intraoperative complications occurred in either group. The total time of hospitalization was similar (mean 4.4 vs. 3.8 days, p = 0.02). No neurological, hematological, or transfusion-related complications or deaths were encountered in either group. Cosmetic outcomes were significantly better in the CVR group with 79% rated as excellent compared to 41% in the SC group (p < 0.01). Fifty-nine percent of the SC patients manifested bony defects at last follow-up visit. Two SC patients required reoperation for poor cosmetic outcomes; CVR was successfully employed in both cases. These findings demonstrate that CVR is superior to SC in providing immediate and lasting correction of calvarial deformities secondary to sagittal synostosis. The optimal age at time of surgery is <6 months; however, CVR can be utilized throughout infancy, while SC becomes progressively less effective after 6 months of age. No significant complications were observed in either group, despite the increased operative manipulation and greater incidence of blood transfusion in the CVR patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9548524     DOI: 10.1159/000121241

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Neurosurg        ISSN: 1016-2291            Impact factor:   1.162


  12 in total

1.  Progressive frontal morphology changes during the first year of a modified Pi procedure for scaphocephaly.

Authors:  Cassio Eduardo Raposo-Amaral; Rafael Denadai; João Paulo Issamu Takata; Enrico Ghizoni; Celso Luiz Buzzo; Cesar Augusto Raposo-Amaral
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2015-09-26       Impact factor: 1.475

2.  Anthropometric changes in the skull base in children with sagittal craniosynostosis submitted to surgical correction.

Authors:  Jose Erasmo Dal'Col Lucio; Hamilton Matushita
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 1.475

3.  Intraoperative tissue expansion in the surgical correction of craniosynostosis.

Authors:  Laura J Doshier; Daniel Fowler; Thomas McEwan; C Lynette Baker; Arshad R Muzaffar
Journal:  Plast Surg (Oakv)       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 0.947

4.  Virtual modeling, stereolithography, and intraoperative CT guidance for the optimization of sagittal synostosis reconstruction: a technical note.

Authors:  Andrew J Kobets; Adam Ammar; Jonathan Nakhla; Aleka Scoco; Rani Nasser; James T Goodrich; Rick Abbott
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2018-02-19       Impact factor: 1.475

5.  Normalization of brain morphology after surgery in sagittal craniosynostosis.

Authors:  Eric D Brooks; Jenny Yang; Joel S Beckett; Cheryl Lacadie; Dustin Scheinost; Sarah Persing; Elizabeth G Zellner; Devon Oosting; Cara Keifer; Hannah E Friedman; Brent Vander Wyk; Roger J Jou; Haosi Sun; Cyril Gary; Charles C Duncan; R Todd Constable; Kevin A Pelphrey; John A Persing
Journal:  J Neurosurg Pediatr       Date:  2015-12-18       Impact factor: 2.375

6.  A simple technique for the correction of frontal bossing in synostotic scaphocephaly.

Authors:  Wolfgang Wagner; Dorothee Wiewrodt
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2008-01-04       Impact factor: 1.475

Review 7.  Review of Past Reports and Current Concepts of Surgical Management for Craniosynostosis.

Authors:  Shigeo Kyutoku; Takayuki Inagaki
Journal:  Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo)       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 1.742

8.  Modification of the Melbourne Method for Total Calvarial Vault Remodeling.

Authors:  Christopher D Hughes; Kathryn V Isaac; Paul F Hwang; Ingrid Ganske; Mark R Proctor; John G Meara
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2018-07-09

9.  Objective three-dimensional analysis of cranial morphology.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Marcus; Leahthan F Domeshek; Rajesh Das; Sean Marshall; Roger Nightingale; Tracey H Stokes; Srinivasan Mukundan
Journal:  Eplasty       Date:  2008-04-09

Review 10.  Minimally Invasive Suturectomy and Postoperative Helmet Therapy : Advantages and Limitations.

Authors:  Sangjoon Chong; Kyu-Chang Wang; Ji Hoon Phi; Ji Yeoun Lee; Seung-Ki Kim
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2016-05-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.