Literature DB >> 9547069

Canal-otolith interactions in the squirrel monkey vestibulo-ocular reflex and the influence of fixation distance.

L Telford1, S H Seidman, G D Paige.   

Abstract

Natural head movements include angular and linear components of motion. Two classes of vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR), mediated by the semicircular canals and otoliths (the angular and linear VOR, or AVOR and LVOR, respectively), compensate for head movements and help maintain binocular fixation on targets in space. In this study, AVOR/LVOR interactions were quantified during complex head motion over a broad range of fixation distances at a fixed stimulus frequency of 4.0 Hz. Binocular eye movements were recorded (search-coil technique) in squirrel monkeys while fixation distance (assessed by vergence) was varied using brief presentations of earth-fixed targets at various distances. Stimuli consisted of rotations around an earth-vertical axis and therefore always activated the AVOR. Horizontal and vertical AVORs were assessed when the head was centered over the axis of rotation and oriented upright (UP) and right-side-down (RD), respectively. AVOR gains increased slightly with increasing vergence in darkness, as expected given the small anterior position of the eyes in the head. Combined AVOR/LVOR responses were recorded when subjects were displaced eccentrically from the rotation axis. Eccentric rotations activated the AVOR just as when the head was centered, but added a translational stimulus which generated an LVOR component in response to interaural (IA) or dorsoventral (DV) tangential accelerations, depending on whether the head was UP or RD, respectively. When the head was eccentric and facing nose-out, the AVOR and LVOR produced ocular responses in the same plane and direction (coplanar and synergistic), and response magnitudes increased with increasing vergence. With the head facing nose-in, AVOR and LVOR response components were oppositely directed (coplanar and antagonistic). The AVOR dominated the response when fixation distance was far, and phase was compensatory for head rotation. As fixation distance decreased toward the rotation axis, responses declined to near zero, and when fixation distance approached even closer, the LVOR component dominated and response phase inverted. The same pattern was observed for both horizontal (head UP) and vertical (head RD) responses. The LVOR was recorded directly by rotating subjects eccentrically but in the nose-up (NU) orientation. The AVOR then generated torsional responses to head roll, coexistent with either horizontal or vertical LVOR responses to tangential acceleration when the subject was oriented head-out or right-side-out, respectively. Only the LVOR response components were modulated by vergence. A vectorial analysis of AVOR, LVOR, and combined responses supports the conclusion that AVOR and LVOR response components combine linearly during complex head motion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9547069     DOI: 10.1007/s002210050261

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  12 in total

1.  Do visual cues contribute to the neural estimate of viewing distance used by the oculomotor system?

Authors:  Min Wei; Gregory C DeAngelis; Dora E Angelaki
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-09-10       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Frequency-dependent spatiotemporal tuning properties of non-eye movement related vestibular neurons to three-dimensional translations in squirrel monkeys.

Authors:  Chiju Chen-Huang; Barry W Peterson
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-04-07       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Non-linear eye movements during visual-vestibular interaction under body oscillation with step-mode lateral linear acceleration.

Authors:  Shigeo Mori; Naomi Katayama
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-10-22       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Vestibulo-ocular responses to vertical translation in normal human subjects.

Authors:  Ke Liao; Mark F Walker; Anand Joshi; Millard Reschke; R John Leigh
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-11-08       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Vergence-mediated modulation of the human angular vestibulo-ocular reflex is unaffected by canal plugging.

Authors:  Americo A Migliaccio; Lloyd B Minor; John P Carey
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-01-09       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Canal and otolith contributions to compensatory tilt responses in pigeons.

Authors:  Kimberly L McArthur; J David Dickman
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-07-16       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Short latency responses in the averaged electro-oculogram elicited by vibrational impulse stimuli applied to the skull: could they reflect vestibulo-ocular reflex function?

Authors:  P Jombík; V Bahýl
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 10.154

Review 8.  Vestibular, locomotor, and vestibulo-autonomic research: 50 years of collaboration with Bernard Cohen.

Authors:  Theodore Raphan
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-11-20       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Three-dimensional analysis of linear vestibulo-ocular reflex in humans during eccentric rotation while facing downwards.

Authors:  Takao Imai; Yasumitsu Takimoto; Noriaki Takeda; Tomoko Okumura; Hidenori Inohara
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Interaction between otolith organ and semicircular canal vestibulo-ocular reflexes during eccentric rotation in humans.

Authors:  Claire C Gianna-Poulin; Robert J Peterka
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-10-30       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.