Literature DB >> 9546569

Does this patient have deep vein thrombosis?

S S Anand1, P S Wells, D Hunt, P Brill-Edwards, D Cook, J S Ginsberg.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To review the validity of the clinical assessment and diagnostic tests in patients with suspected deep vein thrombosis (DVT).
METHODS: A comprehensive review of the literature was conducted by searching MEDLINE from 1966 to April 1997.
RESULTS: Individual symptoms and signs alone do not reliably predict which patients have DVT. Overall, the diagnostic properties of the clinical examination are poor; the sensitivity of the clinical examination ranges from 60% to 96%, and the specificity ranges from 20% to 72%. However, using specific combinations of risk factors, symptoms, and physical signs for DVT, clinicians can reliably stratify patients with suspected DVT into low, moderate, or high pretest probability categories of actually suffering from DVT. This stratification process in combination with noninvasive testing, such as compression ultrasonography, simplifies the management strategies for patients with suspected DVT.
CONCLUSIONS: Use of a clinical prediction guide that includes specific factors from both the history and physical examination in combination with noninvasive tests simplifies management strategies for patients with suspected DVT.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9546569     DOI: 10.1001/jama.279.14.1094

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  21 in total

1.  Protocols for deep vein thrombosis.

Authors:  G Lloyd
Journal:  J Accid Emerg Med       Date:  1999-07

2.  Diagnosis and treatment of deep vein thrombosis.

Authors:  D Ofri
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  2000-09

3.  Improving the physical diagnosis skills of third-year medical students: a controlled trial of a literature-based curriculum.

Authors:  Mark J Fagan; Rebecca A Griffith; Laura Obbard; Carolyn J O'Connor
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 4.  Advances in the diagnosis of venous thromboembolism.

Authors:  Philip S Wells
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 2.300

5.  Residents case report: deep vein thrombosis in a high school baseball pitcher following ulnar collateral ligament (ucl) reconstruction.

Authors:  Joseph Hannon; Craig Garrison; John Conway
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2013-08

6.  Should symptomatic, isolated distal deep vein thrombosis be treated with anticoagulation?

Authors:  Ashish Anil Sule; Tay Jam Chin; Pankaj Handa; Arul Earnest
Journal:  Int J Angiol       Date:  2009

7.  The wheelchair thrombosis syndrome.

Authors:  Ghan-Shyam Lohiya; Lilia Tan-Figueroa; Steve Silverman; Hung Van Le
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 1.798

8.  Risk Stratification Model: Lower-Extremity Ultrasonography for Hospitalized Patients with Suspected Deep Vein Thrombosis.

Authors:  Emily C Alper; Ivan K Ip; Patricia Balthazar; Gregory Piazza; Samuel Z Goldhaber; Carol B Benson; Ronilda Lacson; Ramin Khorasani
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 9.  Should we diagnose and treat distal deep vein thrombosis?

Authors:  Helia Robert-Ebadi; Marc Righini
Journal:  Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program       Date:  2017-12-08

10.  Cost effectiveness of tinzaparin sodium versus unfractionated heparin in the treatment of proximal deep vein thrombosis.

Authors:  J Jaime Caro; Denis Getsios; Ingrid Caro; Judith A O'Brien
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 4.981

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.