Literature DB >> 9544960

Three thousand one hundred seventy-five primary inguinal hernia repairs: advantages of ambulatory open mesh repair using local anesthesia.

A E Kark1, M N Kurzer, P A Belsham.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Controversy exists over the relative advantages of open mesh repair compared with open stitching methods and the laparoscopic approach. STUDY
DESIGN: Two thousand nine hundred six (2,906) consecutive unselected adult patients underwent 3,175 primary inguinal hernia repairs using polypropylene mesh, under local anesthesia on an ambulatory basis. The age range was 15-92 years. The study specifically investigated the postoperative course with regard to pain, complications, and time of return to work.
RESULTS: There were no postoperative deaths and no cases of urinary retention. Two percent of patients developed a hematoma. The incidence of deep infection was 0.3%. No case of testicular atrophy occurred. Postoperatively 19% of patients used no analgesia at all; 60% used oral analgesics for up to 7 days. There was a gradual decrease in time of return to work over four successive 1-year periods. Manual workers returned to work in 15 days (median) in the first year, reducing to 9 days in the fourth year. The overall median time of return to work across the whole group was 9 days. There were eight recurrences with an 18-month to 5-year followup.
CONCLUSIONS: Open mesh repair under local anesthesia is an effective day case technique, particularly in the elderly and medically unfit. The economic benefits are enhanced by low morbidity, early return to normal activities and low recurrence rates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9544960     DOI: 10.1016/s1072-7515(98)00057-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Surg        ISSN: 1072-7515            Impact factor:   6.113


  41 in total

1.  Hernia audit in private practice.

Authors:  A E Kark; M Kurzer; P Belsham
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  Hernia repair. Clinical indicators.

Authors:  A D Clarke; J M Howat
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 1.891

3.  Choice of anesthesia and risk of reoperation for recurrence in groin hernia repair.

Authors:  Pär Nordin; Staffan Haapaniemi; Willem van der Linden; Erik Nilsson
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  [Surgery of inguinal hernia as ambulatory and brief inpatient surgery].

Authors:  V Schumpelick; M Stumpf; R Schwab
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 5.  Growth and trends in publications about abdominal wall hernias and the impact of a specific journal on herniology: a bibliometric analysis.

Authors:  H Kulacoglu; D Oztuna
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2011-08-12       Impact factor: 4.739

6.  Inguinal herniorrhaphy: 25-year results of technical improvements leading to reduced morbidity in 4,029 patients.

Authors:  Maximo Deysine
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2006-05-19       Impact factor: 4.739

Review 7.  Laparoscopic hernia repair--TAPP or/and TEP?

Authors:  B J Leibl; C Jäger; B Kraft; K Kraft; J Schwarz; M Ulrich; R Bittner
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2005-02-15       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 8.  Groin hernia repair: anesthesia.

Authors:  Henrik Kehlet; Eske Aasvang
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  Hemoperitoneum following inguinal hernia repair: a case report.

Authors:  K E Buch; M Reiner; C M Divino
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2007-02-27       Impact factor: 4.739

10.  Local anaesthesia as a risk factor for recurrence after groin hernia repair.

Authors:  H Kehlet; M Bay-Nielsen
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2008-04-04       Impact factor: 4.739

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.