Literature DB >> 9544957

Laparoscopic repair of paraesophageal hiatal hernias.

W A Gantert1, M G Patti, M Arcerito, C Feo, L Stewart, M DePinto, S Bhoyrul, S Rangel, D Tyrrell, Y Fujino, S J Mulvihill, L W Way.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Regardless of symptoms, paraesophageal hiatal hernias should be repaired in order to prevent complications. This study reports the University of California San Francisco experience with laparoscopic repair of paraesophageal hiatal hernias, emphasizing the technical steps essential for good results. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From May 1993 to September 1997, 55 patients, 27 women and 28 men, with a mean age of 67 years (range, 35-102 years) underwent laparoscopic repair of paraesophageal hernias at the University of California San Francisco. Symptoms, which had been present an average of 85 months before surgery, consisted mainly of pain (55%), heartburn (52%), dysphagia (45%), and regurgitation (41%). Of the four patients who presented with acute illness, two had gastric obstruction, one had severe dyspnea, and one had gastric bleeding. Endoscopy demonstrated esophagitis in 25 (69%) of 36 patients, and 24-hour pH-monitoring demonstrated acid reflux in 22 (67%) of 33 patients. Manometry detected severely impaired distal esophageal peristalsis in 17 (52%) of 33 patients. The preferred operation consisted of reduction of the hernia, excision of the sack and the gastric fat pad, closure of the enlarged hiatus without mesh, and construction of a fundoplication anchored by sutures within the abdomen.
RESULTS: Of the 55 patients, the operations of 49 were completed laparoscopically using the following reconstructions: Guarner (270-degree) fundoplication (30 patients); Nissen fundoplication (10 patients); and gastropexy (9 patients). Five (9%) operations were converted to laparotomies. The average operating time was 219 minutes; the average blood loss was less than 25 mL; resumption of an unrestricted diet, 27 hours; and mean hospital stay, 58 hours. Intraoperative technical complications occurred in five (9%) patients. One patient died during surgery from a sudden pulmonary embolus. Two (4%) patients required a second operation for recurrent paraesophageal hernias.
CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic repair of paraesophageal hiatal hernias is safe and effective, but the operation is difficult and good results hinge on details of the operative technique and the surgeon's experience. In this series, the crus could always be closed securely without using mesh. We realized early that a fundoplication should be a routine step, because it corrects reflux and is the best method to secure the gastroesophageal junction in the abdomen.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9544957     DOI: 10.1016/s1072-7515(98)00061-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Surg        ISSN: 1072-7515            Impact factor:   6.113


  34 in total

Review 1.  Surgery for hiatal hernia and GERD. Time for reappraisal and a balanced approach ?

Authors:  D E Low
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-06-19       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Approach to asymptomatic paraesophageal hernia: watchful waiting or elective laparoscopic hernia repair?

Authors:  James J Jung; David M Naimark; Ramy Behman; Teodor P Grantcharov
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-08-04       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Combining laparoscopic giant paraesophageal hernia repair with sleeve gastrectomy in obese patients.

Authors:  Ankit D Patel; Edward Lin; Nathaniel W Lytle; Juan P Toro; Jahnavi Srinivasan; Arvinpal Singh; John F Sweeney; S Scott Davis
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  Controversies in paraesophageal hernia repair: a review of literature.

Authors:  W A Draaisma; H G Gooszen; E Tournoij; I A M J Broeders
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-08-04       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 5.  Mesh repairs in hiatal surgery. The case against mesh repairs in hiatal surgery.

Authors:  Clive J Kelty; Gregory L Falk
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 1.891

6.  Guidelines for the management of hiatal hernia.

Authors:  Geoffrey Paul Kohn; Raymond Richard Price; Steven R DeMeester; Jörg Zehetner; Oliver J Muensterer; Ziad Awad; Sumeet K Mittal; William S Richardson; Dimitrios Stefanidis; Robert D Fanelli
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-09-10       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Laparoscopic repair of giant paraesophageal hernia: 100 consecutive cases.

Authors:  J D Luketich; S Raja; H C Fernando; W Campbell; N A Christie; P O Buenaventura; T L Weigel; R J Keenan; P R Schauer
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Modern era surgical outcomes of elective and emergency giant paraesophageal hernia repair at a high-volume referral center.

Authors:  Rafik K Sorial; Mazzn Ali; Pepa Kaneva; Julio F Fiore; Melina Vassiliou; Gerald M Fried; Liane S Feldman; Lorenzo E Ferri; Lawrence Lee; Carmen L Mueller
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-03-28       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Outcomes after repair of the intrathoracic stomach: objective follow-up of up to 5 years.

Authors:  S K Mittal; J Bikhchandani; O Gurney; F Yano; T Lee
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-07-10       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Should elective repair of intrathoracic stomach be encouraged?

Authors:  Marek Polomsky; Carolyn E Jones; Boris Sepesi; Matthew O'Connor; Alexi Matousek; Rui Hu; Daniel P Raymond; Virginia R Litle; Thomas J Watson; Jeffrey H Peters
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2009-12-03       Impact factor: 3.452

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.