Literature DB >> 9544830

Results of a qualitative and field study using the WHOQOL instrument for cancer patients.

M Tazaki1, Y Nakane, T Endo, F Kakikawa, K Kano, H Kawano, K Kuriyama, K Kuroko, E Miyaoka, H Ohta, N Okamoto, S Shiratori, S Takamiya, K Tanemura, R Tsuchiya.   

Abstract

The main purpose of the study was to evaluate quality of life (QOL) among cancer patients using the WHOQOL-100 instrument and to see if any significant differences were seen in cancer stages, treatment status and prognosis. This study consisted of two parts; qualitative and quantitative. For the qualitative study, two focus groups were conducted by medical professionals to establish the applicability of the WHOQOL instrument in evaluating the QOL of cancer patients, but most participants were negative about using a generic instrument such as WHOQOL. For the quantitative study, 197 cancer patients (average age 55.86) from eight medical centers using the WHOQOL instrument, in addition to each patient's information sheet filled in by their own physicians, were analyzed. The average overall QOL score was 3.39. There was high reliability (Cronbach's alpha = 0.9685) and a high correlation between the psychological and the environmental domains (r = 0.7021), the physical domain and the level of independence (r = 0.6031) and social relations and the environment (r = 0.6856) and between health conditions perceived by patients and QOL scores. In addition, differences by gender, treatments and cancer sites were also found to be significantly different at the 5% significance level. The results indicated that the WHOQOL core instrument was sensitive enough to evaluate the QOL of cancer patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9544830     DOI: 10.1093/jjco/28.2.134

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Jpn J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0368-2811            Impact factor:   3.019


  13 in total

1.  The suitability of the WHOQOL-BREF for Canadian and Norwegian older adults.

Authors:  Mary H Kalfoss; Gail Low; Anita E Molzahn
Journal:  Eur J Ageing       Date:  2008-02-13

2.  The WHO quality of life (WHOQOL) questionnaire: Spanish development and validation studies.

Authors:  Ramona Lucas-Carrasco
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2011-05-25       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  The minimal clinical important difference in the World Health Organization Quality of Life instrument--100.

Authors:  Brenda L Den Oudsten; Wobbe P Zijlstra; Jolanda De Vries
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2012-12-01       Impact factor: 3.603

4.  Psychometric properties of the WHOQOL-BREF in an Iranian adult sample.

Authors:  A R Yousefy; A R Usefy; Gh R Ghassemi; N Sarrafzadegan; S Mallik; A M Baghaei; K Rabiei
Journal:  Community Ment Health J       Date:  2010-01-09

5.  Health-related quality of life after first-line anti-cancer treatments for advanced non-small cell lung cancer in clinical practice.

Authors:  Szu-Chun Yang; Wu-Wei Lai; Tzuen-Ren Hsiue; Wu-Chou Su; Cheng-Kuan Lin; Jing-Shiang Hwang; Jung-Der Wang
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2015-11-07       Impact factor: 4.147

6.  Relationship between the Physical and Psychosocial Conditions of Postoperative Gastrointestinal Cancer Patients and their Responses to an Informational Material.

Authors:  Michiyo Mizuno; Jun Kataoka; Fumiko Oishi
Journal:  Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs       Date:  2017 Jan-Mar

7.  Quality of life evaluation in Japanese pregnant women with striae gravidarum: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Kotomi Yamaguchi; Nobuhiko Suganuma; Kazutomo Ohashi
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2012-08-21

Review 8.  An increasing number of qualitative research papers in oncology and palliative care: does it mean a thorough development of the methodology of research?

Authors:  Claudia Borreani; Guido Miccinesi; Cinzia Brunelli; Micaela Lina
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2004-01-23       Impact factor: 3.186

9.  Longitudinal Study on Quality of Life and Psychosocial Conditions in Light of Responses to Illness-Related Information in Postoperative Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Michiyo Mizuno; Jun Kataoka; Fumiko Oishi
Journal:  Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs       Date:  2018 Apr-Jun

10.  Evaluation of a Novel Quality of Life Scale for Schoolchildren with Nonstrabismic Binocular Vision Anomalies.

Authors:  Jiali Hu; Guokun Wang; Zhe Zhou; Yan Sun; Qingling Zhang; Jinhui Wu; Yu Gao
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2020-07-30       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.