Literature DB >> 9544767

A randomized, double-blind trial comparing combinations of nevirapine, didanosine, and zidovudine for HIV-infected patients: the INCAS Trial. Italy, The Netherlands, Canada and Australia Study.

J S Montaner1, P Reiss, D Cooper, S Vella, M Harris, B Conway, M A Wainberg, D Smith, P Robinson, D Hall, M Myers, J M Lange.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Current guidelines recommend that individuals infected with the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) be treated using combinations of antiretroviral agents to achieve sustained suppression of viral replication as measured by the plasma HIV-1 RNA assay, in the hopes of achieving prolonged remission of the disease. However, until recently, many drug combinations have not led to sustained suppression of HIV-1 RNA.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the virologic effects of various combinations of nevirapine, didanosine, and zidovudine.
DESIGN: Double-blind, controlled, randomized trial.
SETTING: University-affiliated ambulatory research clinics in Italy, the Netherlands, Canada and Australia (INCAS). PATIENTS: Antiretroviral therapy-naive adults free of the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome with CD4 cell counts between 0.20 and 0.60x10(9)/L (200-600/microL). INTERVENTION: Patients received zidovudine plus nevirapine (plus didanosine placebo), zidovudine plus didanosine (plus nevirapine placebo), or zidovudine plus didanosine plus nevirapine. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Plasma HIV-1 RNA.
RESULTS: Of the 153 enrolled patients, 151 were evaluable. At week 8, plasma HIV-1 RNA levels had decreased by log 2.18, 1.55, and 0.90 in the triple drug therapy, zidovudine plus didanosine, and zidovudine plus nevirapine groups, respectively (P<.05). The proportions of patients with plasma HIV-1 RNA levels below 20 copies per milliliter at week 52 were 51%, 12%, and 0% in the triple drug therapy, zidovudine plus didanosine, and zidovudine plus nevirapine groups, respectively (P<.001). Viral amplification was attempted in 59 patients at 6 months. Viral isolation was unsuccessful in 19 (79%) of 24, 10 (53%) of 19, and 5 (31%) of 16 patients in the triple drug therapy, zidovudine plus didanosine, and zidovudine plus nevirapine groups, respectively. Among patients from whom virus could be amplified, resistance to nevirapine was found in all 11 patients receiving zidovudine plus nevirapine and in all 5 patients receiving triple drug therapy. Rates of disease progression or death were 23% (11/47), 25% (13/53), and 12% (6/51) for the zidovudine plus nevirapine, zidovudine plus didanosine, and triple drug therapy groups, respectively (P=.08).
CONCLUSIONS: Triple drug therapy with zidovudine, didanosine, and nevirapine led to a substantially greater and sustained decrease in plasma viral load than the 2-drug regimens studied. Our results also suggest that suppression of viral replication, as demonstrated by a decrease in the plasma HIV-1 RNA load below the level of quantitation of the most sensitive test available, may at least forestall the development of resistance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9544767     DOI: 10.1001/jama.279.12.930

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  108 in total

1.  ACTG (AIDS Clinical Trials Group) 384: a strategy trial comparing consecutive treatments for HIV-1.

Authors:  L M Smeaton; V DeGruttola; G K Robbins; R W Shafer
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  2001-04

2.  When should we delay highly active antiretroviral therapy?

Authors:  D R Bangsberg; A Moss
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 3.  Palliative care for HIV disease in the era of highly active antiretroviral therapy.

Authors:  B Greenberg; R McCorkle; D Vlahov; P A Selwyn
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.671

4.  Using non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors in treating HIV disease: where are the therapeutic niches?

Authors:  V Idemyor
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 1.798

5.  Antiretroviral therapy adherence and viral suppression in HIV-infected drug users: comparison of self-report and electronic monitoring.

Authors:  J H Arnsten; P A Demas; H Farzadegan; R W Grant; M N Gourevitch; C J Chang; D Buono; H Eckholdt; A A Howard; E E Schoenbaum
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2001-09-05       Impact factor: 9.079

6.  The Journey of HIV-1 Non-Nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors (NNRTIs) from Lab to Clinic.

Authors:  Vigneshwaran Namasivayam; Murugesan Vanangamudi; Victor G Kramer; Sonali Kurup; Peng Zhan; Xinyong Liu; Jacob Kongsted; Siddappa N Byrareddy
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2018-12-27       Impact factor: 7.446

Review 7.  Nevirapine: a review of its use in the prevention and treatment of paediatric HIV infection.

Authors:  A Bardsley-Elliot; C M Perry
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2000 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.022

Review 8.  Didanosine: an updated review of its use in HIV infection.

Authors:  C M Perry; S Noble
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 9.546

9.  Is average adherence to HIV antiretroviral therapy enough?

Authors:  David R Bangsberg; Steven G Deeks
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 5.128

10.  Adherence and plasma HIV RNA responses to highly active antiretroviral therapy among HIV-1 infected injection drug users.

Authors:  Evan Wood; Julio S G Montaner; Benita Yip; Mark W Tyndall; Martin T Schechter; Michael V O'Shaughnessy; Robert S Hogg
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2003-09-30       Impact factor: 8.262

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.