Literature DB >> 954460

A test of the practical value of estimating breath sound intensity. Breath sounds related to measured ventilatory function.

N E Pardee, C J Martin, E H Morgan.   

Abstract

Each of four examiners performed standardized physical examinations on a group of patients who had just undergone tests of ventilatory function. The intensity of breath sounds heard with deep inspiration was graded on a rating scale of 0 to 4; the grades in six areas of the chest were added to give a total score, with possible values ranging from 0 to 24. Correlation of breath-sound scores with percentage of predicted forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) was significant at the 1 percent level for all of the examiners. Differences between the examiners in their assessment of breath sounds were not statistically significant. Grading the loudness of breath sounds was a poor screening test for mild ventilatory abnormality, but normal breath sounds nearly excluded the possibility of severe reduction in the FEV1. Definitely reduced breath-sound intensity was strong evidence for the presence of obstructive pulmonary disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1976        PMID: 954460     DOI: 10.1378/chest.70.3.341

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chest        ISSN: 0012-3692            Impact factor:   9.410


  9 in total

Review 1.  Narrative review: should teaching of the respiratory physical examination be restricted only to signs with proven reliability and validity?

Authors:  Jochanan Benbassat; Reuben Baumal
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2010-03-27       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Breath sounds in the clinical assessment of airflow obstruction.

Authors:  A B Bohadana; R Peslin; H Uffholtz
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1978-06       Impact factor: 9.139

3.  Auscultation of the lung: past lessons, future possibilities.

Authors:  R L Murphy
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1981-02       Impact factor: 9.139

4.  Listening to the lungs.

Authors: 
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1978-12-02

5.  Potential for lung sound monitoring during bronchial provocation testing.

Authors:  A B Bohadana; R Peslin; H Uffholtz; G Pauli
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 9.139

6.  Lung sound intensity in patients with emphysema and in normal subjects at standardised airflows.

Authors:  H J Schreur; P J Sterk; J Vanderschoot; H C van Klink; E van Vollenhoven; J H Dijkman
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 9.139

Review 7.  Auscultation of the respiratory system.

Authors:  Malay Sarkar; Irappa Madabhavi; Narasimhalu Niranjan; Megha Dogra
Journal:  Ann Thorac Med       Date:  2015 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.219

8.  Should chest examination be reinstated in the early diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease?

Authors:  Katja Oshaug; Peder A Halvorsen; Hasse Melbye
Journal:  Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis       Date:  2013-07-31

9.  The correlation between lung sound distribution and pulmonary function in COPD patients.

Authors:  Masamichi Mineshita; Hirotaka Kida; Hiroshi Handa; Hiroki Nishine; Naoki Furuya; Seiichi Nobuyama; Takeo Inoue; Shin Matsuoka; Teruomi Miyazawa
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-09-22       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.