Literature DB >> 9541341

Adaptations of the masticatory system after bilateral fractures of the mandibular condylar process.

R M Talwar1, E Ellis, G S Throckmorton.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The objective of this investigation was to evaluate the adaptations that occur in the masticatory system after treatment of bilateral fractures of the mandibular condylar process. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-two patients (15 men and seven women) with bilateral condylar process fractures treated by open reduction and rigid internal fixation (n = 6), closed therapy (n = 14), or a combination of these techniques (n = 2) were compared with 22 sex- and age-matched controls. Measures of mandibular range of motion, bite force, muscle activity, estimated joint forces, and skeletal morphology were determined at 6 weeks, 6 months, and 1, 2, and 3 years after treatment in all subjects. Various statistical tests were used for comparing differences between patients and controls.
RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the patients' morphologic measures for the open and closed reduction procedures; therefore, all of these patients were tested as a single group. After treatment, patients had significantly increased mandibular plane and gonial angles and decreased facial axis angles. They also showed a significant reduction in posterior facial height and moment arm length for the masseter and pterygoid muscles. Anterior and posterior temporalis muscle direction also was significantly different between patients and controls. Patients had significantly limited mobility during the first year after fracture. Bite forces were lower for patients at all times and tooth positions, with a significant difference at 6 weeks after treatment. Patients had a tendency to use proportionally higher temporalis muscle activity during maximum biting; however, the differences were not statistically significant, probably because of the small sample size. The estimated joint force magnitudes were essentially identical between patients and controls; however, the direction of the patients' joint forces were more posteriorly directed for both incisor and molar bites.
CONCLUSION: The results of this study suggest that early reduction in mandibular range of motion, bite force, and the distribution of masticatory muscle activity assist in preventing overloading of the bilaterally fractured mandibular condylar processes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9541341     DOI: 10.1016/s0278-2391(98)90707-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0278-2391            Impact factor:   1.895


  8 in total

1.  Does Fracture Pattern Influence Functional Outcomes in the Management of Bilateral Mandibular Condylar Injuries?

Authors:  Howard D Wang; Srinivas M Susarla; Robin Yang; Gerhard S Mundinger; Benjamin D Schultz; Abhishake Banda; Alexandra MacMillan; Paul N Manson; Arthur J Nam; Amir H Dorafshar
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2018-09-21

2.  Electromyographic analysis of anterior temporalis and superficial masseter muscles in mandibular angle fractures--a pilot study.

Authors:  Saurab Bither; Uma Mahindra; Rajshekhar Halli; Makarand Bakshi; Yogesh Kini; Mahendra Shende; Rupika Bither
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2012-01-17

3.  A randomized controlled trial to compare functional, combined rigid and functional and rigid fixation in double mandibular fractures.

Authors:  Sandeep Pandey; Poonam Yadav; Ajoy Roychoudhury; Ongkila Bhutia; Devalina Goswami
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2022-02-22

4.  Assessment of masticatory function using bite force measurements in patients treated for mandibular fractures.

Authors:  Deborah Sybil; K Gopalkrishnan
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2013-09-26

5.  Prospective closed treatment of nondisplaced and nondislocated condylar neck and head fractures versus open reposition internal fixation of displaced and dislocated fractures.

Authors:  Constantin A Landes; Kai Day; Ruben Lipphardt; Robert Sader
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2008-07

6.  Is Open Reduction and Internal Fixation Sacrosanct in the Management of Subcondylar Fractures: A Comparative Study.

Authors:  Nandini Dayalan; Bhawna Kumari; Shilpa Sunil Khanna; Faisal Mohiuddin Ansari; Ramandeep Grewal; Sanket Kumar; Rahul V C Tiwari
Journal:  J Pharm Bioallied Sci       Date:  2021-11-10

7.  Mini - Retromandibular access to sub condylar mandibular fractures - Our experience.

Authors:  Saravanan Kandasamy; Reena Rachel John
Journal:  Natl J Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2022-04-20

Review 8.  The treatment of condylar fractures: to open or not to open? A critical review of this controversy.

Authors:  Renato Valiati; Danilo Ibrahim; Marcelo Emir Requia Abreu; Claiton Heitz; Rogério Belle de Oliveira; Rogério Miranda Pagnoncelli; Daniela Nascimento Silva
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2008-10-23       Impact factor: 3.738

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.