Literature DB >> 9541081

Faecal occult blood screening for colorectal cancer: is it cost-effective?

D K Whynes1, A R Neilson, A R Walker, J D Hardcastle.   

Abstract

Recently published evidence from two large-scale clinical trials conducted in England and in Denmark suggests that faecal occult blood screening for colorectal cancer significantly reduces mortality. However, before screening can be advocated as part of national health policy, its cost-effectiveness must be demonstrated. The English screening trial has been the subject of a detailed economic evaluation over the past 10 years In this paper, cost-effectiveness estimates of screening are presented, based on cost and outcome data combined in a mathematical model developed from the trial's clinical findings The estimates of cost per quality-adjusted life-year gained from colorectal cancer screening show the procedure to be of similar cost-effectiveness to breast cancer screening in the short term. Over the longer term, however, the estimates for colorectal cancer screening appear superior.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9541081     DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1099-1050(199802)7:1<21::aid-hec306>3.0.co;2-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Econ        ISSN: 1057-9230            Impact factor:   3.046


  13 in total

Review 1.  The limited incorporation of economic analyses in clinical practice guidelines.

Authors:  Joel F Wallace; Scott R Weingarten; Chiun-Fang Chiou; James M Henning; Andriana A Hohlbauch; Margaret S Richards; Nicole S Herzog; Lior S Lewensztain; Joshua J Ofman
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 2.  Population-based screening for colorectal cancer with faecal occult blood test--do we really have enough evidence?

Authors:  Göran Ekelund; Jonas Manjer; Sophia Zackrisson
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2010-07-30       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  The dynamics of colorectal cancer management in 17 countries.

Authors:  Panos Kanavos; Willemien Schurer
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2010-01

Review 4.  Calibration methods used in cancer simulation models and suggested reporting guidelines.

Authors:  Natasha K Stout; Amy B Knudsen; Chung Yin Kong; Pamela M McMahon; G Scott Gazelle
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 4.981

5.  Option appraisal of population-based colorectal cancer screening programmes in England.

Authors:  Paul Tappenden; James Chilcott; Simon Eggington; Julietta Patnick; Hannah Sakai; Jonathon Karnon
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2006-12-01       Impact factor: 23.059

6.  Simulation of colorectal cancer screening: what we do and do not know and does it matter.

Authors:  Marjolein van Ballegooijen; Rob Boer; Ann G Zauber
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.043

7.  The risks of screening: data from the Nottingham randomised controlled trial of faecal occult blood screening for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  M H Robinson; J D Hardcastle; S M Moss; S S Amar; J O Chamberlain; N C Armitage; J H Scholefield; C M Mangham
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 23.059

8.  A cost analysis of colonoscopy using microcosting and time-and-motion techniques.

Authors:  Stephen G Henry; Reid M Ness; Renée A Stiles; Ayumi K Shintani; Robert S Dittus
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2007-07-31       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  Cost effectiveness analysis of intensive versus conventional follow up after curative resection for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Andrew G Renehan; Sarah T O'Dwyer; David K Whynes
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-01-10

Review 10.  Cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar; Amy B Knudsen; Hermann Brenner
Journal:  Epidemiol Rev       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 6.222

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.