Literature DB >> 9540937

Human immunodeficiency virus test refusal in pregnancy: a challenge to voluntary testing.

D Carusi1, L A Learman, S F Posner.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine if awareness of methods to reduce vertical transmission of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) is associated with HIV test acceptance and to clarify patients' attitudes toward routine versus elective prenatal HIV testing.
METHODS: In a cross-sectional study, 247 antenatal patients were surveyed regarding HIV knowledge, self-perceived HIV risk, and willingness to learn a positive test result. This information, along with demographic and risk factor data, was related to HIV test acceptance. Patients also indicated their attitudes toward routine versus elective prenatal testing for HIV and other common prenatal screening tests.
RESULTS: Seventy-two percent of antenatal patients accepted HIV testing. Test acceptance was not associated with the presence of risk factors, self-perceived HIV risk, or demographic factors, including race and ethnicity. Test acceptance was associated positively with patients' knowledge of a medical intervention to reduce vertical transmission and their willingness to learn a positive HIV test result. Only 24% of patients knew that the risk of vertical transmission could be reduced using medication. Sixty-nine percent of patients said that prenatal HIV testing should be routine, whereas 27% said that it should be done only after specific written consent. As a group, our patients viewed HIV screening no differently from screening for other infections in pregnancy.
CONCLUSION: Interventions aimed at increasing HIV testing rates among pregnant women should focus on educating patients about vertical transmission reduction and promising new therapies for HIV infection. Proponents of elective testing should re-evaluate the assumption that patients view HIV testing differently from other prenatal tests for which separate written consent is not required.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9540937     DOI: 10.1016/s0029-7844(97)00714-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  7 in total

1.  Trends in HIV testing among pregnant women: United States, 1994-1999.

Authors:  A Lansky; J L Jones; R L Frey; M L Lindegren
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Failure to prevent perinatal HIV infection.

Authors:  Ari Bitnun; Susan M King; Cheryl Arneson; Stanley E Read
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2002-04-02       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 3.  Opt in or opt out: what is optimal for prenatal screening for HIV infection?

Authors:  Sharon Walmsley
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2003-03-18       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Trends in prenatal discussion and HIV testing, 1996-2001: Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System.

Authors:  Amy Lansky; Stephanie L Sansom; Leslie L Harrison; Tonya Stancil
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2007-03-06

5.  Barriers to universal prenatal HIV testing in 4 US locations in 1997.

Authors:  R A Royce; E B Walter; M I Fernandez; T E Wilson; J R Ickovics; R J Simonds
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Factors associated with declining a rapid human immunodeficiency virus test in labor and delivery.

Authors:  Kathrine R Tan; Margaret A Lampe; Susan P Danner; Patricia Kissinger; Mayris P Webber; Mardge H Cohen; Mary Jo O'Sullivan; Steven Nesheim; Denise J Jamieson
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2011-01

7.  Patient perspectives with abbreviated versus standard pre-test HIV counseling in the prenatal setting: a randomized-controlled, non-inferiority trial.

Authors:  Deborah Cohan; Elvira Gomez; Mara Greenberg; Sierra Washington; Edwin D Charlebois
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-04-15       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.