PROBLEM: The Tri Auto ZX (J. Morita Co., Kyoto, Japan) is a cordless endodontic handpiece with a built-in apex locator that is programmed to reverse the direction of rotation when the file reaches a predetermined apical level or when torque becomes excessive. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this investigation was to examine the apical extent of rotary canal instrumentation and the ability to maintain apical constriction with the Tri Auto ZX at different automated settings. STUDY DESIGN: In 60 extracted teeth, canals were measured to the apical constriction, first visually and then electronically with the Tri Auto ZX; then they were instrumented with nickel titanium rotary files. For the instrumentation, the automatic apical reverse mechanism of the handpiece was set to 1, 1.5, or 2; these settings correspond to different distances from the apical foramen. Instrumentation was carried out apically until rotation was reversed by the automatic apical reverse function; the instrumented length was then measured, and the canal was filled with gutta-percha and sealer. The integrity of the apical constriction was assessed by exposing the apical 4 mm of the canal and observing the dentin-cementum junction. Paired t-tests were used to compare the visually measured length, the electronically measured length, and the instrumented length for each tooth. RESULTS: On average, the electronically measured length was 0.54 mm shorter than the visually measured length (p < 0.05). When the automatic apical reverse mechanism's setting was 1, the instrumented length was 0.1 mm shorter than the electronically measured length; when the setting was 1.5, the instrumented length was 0.36 mm shorter than the electronically measured length (p < 0.01). Results were inconsistent when the setting was 2. CONCLUSION: Instrumentation with the automatic apical reverse feature set at 1 consistently approximated the apical constriction; however, the constriction was frequently enlarged.
PROBLEM: The Tri Auto ZX (J. Morita Co., Kyoto, Japan) is a cordless endodontic handpiece with a built-in apex locator that is programmed to reverse the direction of rotation when the file reaches a predetermined apical level or when torque becomes excessive. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this investigation was to examine the apical extent of rotary canal instrumentation and the ability to maintain apical constriction with the Tri Auto ZX at different automated settings. STUDY DESIGN: In 60 extracted teeth, canals were measured to the apical constriction, first visually and then electronically with the Tri Auto ZX; then they were instrumented with nickel titanium rotary files. For the instrumentation, the automatic apical reverse mechanism of the handpiece was set to 1, 1.5, or 2; these settings correspond to different distances from the apical foramen. Instrumentation was carried out apically until rotation was reversed by the automatic apical reverse function; the instrumented length was then measured, and the canal was filled with gutta-percha and sealer. The integrity of the apical constriction was assessed by exposing the apical 4 mm of the canal and observing the dentin-cementum junction. Paired t-tests were used to compare the visually measured length, the electronically measured length, and the instrumented length for each tooth. RESULTS: On average, the electronically measured length was 0.54 mm shorter than the visually measured length (p < 0.05). When the automatic apical reverse mechanism's setting was 1, the instrumented length was 0.1 mm shorter than the electronically measured length; when the setting was 1.5, the instrumented length was 0.36 mm shorter than the electronically measured length (p < 0.01). Results were inconsistent when the setting was 2. CONCLUSION: Instrumentation with the automatic apical reverse feature set at 1 consistently approximated the apical constriction; however, the constriction was frequently enlarged.
Authors: David W Christofzik; Andreas Bartols; Mahmoud Khaled; Birte Größner-Schreiber; Christof E Dörfer Journal: BMC Oral Health Date: 2017-11-29 Impact factor: 2.757