Literature DB >> 9539758

Instability of signaling resolution models of parent-offspring conflict.

M A Rodríguez-Gironés1, M Enquist, P A Cotton.   

Abstract

Recent signaling resolution models of parent-offspring conflict have provided an important framework for theoretical and empirical studies of communication and parental care. According to these models, signaling of need is stabilized by its cost. However, our computer simulations of the evolutionary dynamics of chick begging and parental investment show that in Godfray's model the signaling equilibrium is evolutionarily unstable: populations that start at the signaling equilibrium quickly depart from it. Furthermore, the signaling and nonsignaling equilibria are linked by a continuum of equilibria where chicks above a certain condition do not signal and we show that, contrary to intuition, fitness increases monotonically as the proportion of young that signal decreases. This result forces us to reconsider much of the current literature on signaling of need and highlights the need to investigate the evolutionary stability of signaling equilibria based on the handicap principle.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9539758      PMCID: PMC22510          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.95.8.4453

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  7 in total

1.  Mate selection-a selection for a handicap.

Authors:  A Zahavi
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1975-09       Impact factor: 2.691

2.  Biological signals as handicaps.

Authors:  A Grafen
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1990-06-21       Impact factor: 2.691

3.  Sexual selection unhandicapped by the Fisher process.

Authors:  A Grafen
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1990-06-21       Impact factor: 2.691

4.  Begging the question: are offspring solicitation behaviours signals of need?

Authors:  R Kilner; R A Johnstone
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 17.712

5.  The evolution of begging: signaling and sibling competition.

Authors:  M A Rodríguez-Gironés; P A Cotton; A Kacelnik
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1996-12-10       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Conflict, receiver bias and the evolution of signal form.

Authors:  A Arak; M Enquist
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1995-09-29       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  The evolution of exploitation and honesty in animal communication: a model using artificial neural networks.

Authors:  D C Krakauer; R A Johnstone
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1995-05-30       Impact factor: 6.237

  7 in total
  7 in total

Review 1.  Begging and bleating: the evolution of parent-offspring signalling.

Authors:  H C Godfray; R A Johnstone
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2000-11-29       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Sibling competition stabilizes signalling resolution models of parent-offspring conflict.

Authors:  M A Rodríguez-Gironés
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1999-12-07       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Signaling of need, sibling competition, and the cost of honesty.

Authors:  R A Johnstone
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-10-26       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Partial begging: an empirical model for the early evolution of offspring signalling.

Authors:  Per T Smiseth; Clive T Darwell; Allen J Moore
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-09-07       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  One problem, too many solutions: How costly is honest signalling of need?

Authors:  Szabolcs Számadó; Dániel Czégel; István Zachar
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-01-11       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Antagonistic parent-offspring co-adaptation.

Authors:  Mathias Kölliker; Benjamin J Ridenhour; Sabrina Gaba
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-01-06       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  An Evolutionary Comparison of the Handicap Principle and Hybrid Equilibrium Theories of Signaling.

Authors:  Patrick Kane; Kevin J S Zollman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-08       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.